Tuesday, February 23, 2016

The Gap:

We were born into a society that has been deficient in the feminine virtues. Our society stresses the aggressive, the impulsive, the competitive, the boorish, the external, and – most ominously of all, the equal – over what is passive, reserved, cooperative, sophisticated, internal, and irregular. Truly feminine societies, before they were Americanised, have all ways intuited this imbalance, for the second set of traits was woven intimately into the fabric of their cultures. Most ironic of course is the term “feminism”, for if any thing is alien to femininity it is this new form of patriarchal dogma. I mean: These chicks honestly presuppose that society has been patriarchal since the DAWN OF TIME, and yet they expect to attain “equality” (whatever that insane abstraction means on a case-by-case basis) within only two hundred years. How long did it take the earth to form? For Pangaea to split? For thumbs to appear? The only woman I’ve known to have any sense on the matter was M.L. von Franz, who pointed out that our society is much too hectic for the female body. Sure: women have given men a literal run for their money. But is this a token of bragging? Jungians like von Franz all ways knew that Nature would have her say. So if the statistics carry any merit whatsoever they simply reflect the bitter fact that Women Are Underperforming. And that is nothing new; von Franz intuited that women on average are more feminine than men, possessing more feminine traits both physically and psychically, and she made this proclamation towards the end of a very long career. So unless the life-long efforts of a female simply don’t MATTER, and we are much more concerned with filling our pockets with welfare checks under the PRESUPPOSITION that women are putting in “equal work” to men, rather than getting their asses kicked by the system that they ought not to have joined in the first place, then von Franz can be rendered a dinosaur. But yet even THAT reflects our one-sidedness: our tendency to prefer what is young and new to what is old. There is nothing “liberal” about feminism; the doctrine of equal work and equal pay is totally alien to the Marxist notion of giving according to need and performing according to the LIMITS OF ONE’S NATURAL ABILITY. There is no politically correct way of putting it: either the wage gap was invented to breed Fascism, alongside so many other cruel devices, or it is the long-awaited scientific evidence that women CANNOT perform in a male-dominated world, and that only by REFUSING to perform, by becoming feminine again, can they hope to restore balance TO this world. The next time a young girl complains about getting paid seventy-seven cents per dollar, give her a quarter, and tell her she can keep the two cents. She’s a penny-pincher anyhow. And if she doesn’t have the patience to start saving up every quarter that she feels entitled to, then let her continue to wait for the day that men and women are “equal” in whatever way she decides to define it. I guarantee you: it shall take her MUCH longer.

Dm.A.A.

Saturday, February 20, 2016

A Zen Stori:

Rape Apologetics in [#] moves:

1. Is sex exploitative?

Yes.

2. Then how is rape any different?

It is without consent.

3. What difference does consent make if sex is exploitative?

Okay. Sex is not exploitative.

4. Interesting. So sex is help full?

Yes.

5. Fascinating. So what difference does it make if help is solicited or unsolicited? After all: unsolicited help has the added advantage of its being informative of its own necessity.

You see: the irony here is that I am the most innocent of all of you. I have never had sex. And it is because I totally agree with you about rapists. But as an equalist I wonder why you stoop to their level.

Dm.A.A.

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Satan, know no rest:

Satan, know no rest:

http://www.signature-reads.com/2013/05/little-did-we-know-5-myths-about-sociopathy-debunked/

WOW. Is any one actually FOOLED by this? If so it could only be a sign of the times. Not that it is any thing new. I have had it up to here covering for these cynical satanists who try to act like every one is secretly on their level, "whether they know it or not." They invariably screw me over at one point or an other, and yet who are they fooling? Not I. The most they can do now is trigger my indignation, mixed with a sense of public humiliation. After all: if This kind of crud is in the news, then wow must a lot of people be weak of fibre. Of course no one will publish confessions of a rapist or confessions of a child molester (explicitly) because that just hits a little too close to home. Every cynical relativist falls apart the moment that one's own flesh (and blood) come under threat.

Yes: the world is pervaded with evil. But you know in your heart (if you have one) that you mean well and do well. Invariably the people who try to tell you you are worse than you believe your self to be cause destruction the kinds of which would shock you, its consequences leaving you vulnerable beyond belief. But courage and love compel us to learn from their missed takes and eventually to forgive them. That is the journey of life; this is but merely a temptation.

Do not be fooled. Survive. The world is full of good people and goodness in general. The seduction of power winds us all up in a hell of distrust and suicidal nihilism. And the wolf does appear in sheep's clothing; the devil, whether metaphysical or metaphorical, all ways offers you what you want. In this case: a break from genuine responsibility. Another meek artificial coping mechanism for the kali yuga. But look more closely: does it not depend all ways upon the labours of the exploited Good? If ANY thing is hidden, it is surely THAT. But do not let them tell you, once you've established a purity of intent, that that too is prone to disillusion. Free will cannot be stolen from you. Even if you alone know your self to mean well, that is enough to light a light in the dark. All else is superficiality. It makes a difference; sufferers, even evil ones, will take note of it. Only self-absorption can cloud this crucial and beautiful difference.

But do not take my word for it. Dm.