Saturday, September 6, 2014

On Reporting.

On Reporting.

It is hard for me to read anything that passes its self off as fact and is only loosely based on immediate experience. If you don’t even have the nerve to insert yourself into the description, showing how you reacted and why these things would have appeared this way to you, then I cannot trust you as a writer.

My plaint is not a sentimental one. “And here I might have distorted this” encourages the writer to elaborate, and that gives more information. Rather than a direct statement, cumbersome to work with because it is definitionally dubious, the reader is given now a series of either very concrete details or potential impressions, as a kind of colloid, left to decide what might have happened without being expected to believe it. This is not an insult to a reader’s intelligence, whereas an account that makes pretenses towards objectivity is.


Dm.A.A.

No comments:

Post a Comment