Playing Chess is
an exercise in empathy. The most skilled players can see the board from the
perspective of their opponents. They can project what the rational Other will
do at any moment, at least as a set of possibilities. Because the player, however,
is not in possession of his opponent’s will or temperament, there are limits to
his knowledge, and in accordance with those limits his own power over the board
itself is restricted, and the game is rewarding for its novelty. This reward
ceases to be the case when either player is so hopelessly dominated by the
aggressive will to dominate that the game becomes controlled and predictable.
At that point, even that player’s claims – that it is in fact his opponent who
wishes to dominate – become mute, for they can be fairly regarded as sheer
strategy, and they might be dismissed as cheating for their deceptive quality.
The unwritten rule in Chess is this: that in enjoying the impersonal beauty of
the board, one made impersonal by the extent to which even a loss can be
perceived as beautiful by the loser, one must remain focused upon the goal of
using one’s own power to bring about an end that is in accordance with the
virtues of a true competitor who persists in an attempt to win. Yet Life cannot
be reduced to the competition, even if it were all expressed as a game, for
were it entirely competitive then all ready the will to win would have become
the will to dominate and kill the game itself, reducing its impersonal beauty
to personal depravity, simply because any attempt to compete with those who are
unwilling to compete, but who seek only to participate, would as such bar
participation to those people. It follows that to disadvantage another for one’s
own gain and against that person’s consent can only be done in the spirit of
reserving one’s right to participate, and so long as one has all ready been
included one can no longer accuse the disadvantaged party of pettiness under
the auspices of a competition that that party had not consented to or by
reference to one’s own will to win coming into conflict with that of the
opponent. Such plaints will obviously fall on deaf ears when the public is
aware that what had become a competition was supposed to have been an entirely
different sort of game to begin with: a cooperative friendship.
Dm.A.A.
No comments:
Post a Comment