BOOM:

I don’t see why you would call me a “Boomer”. I was born in 1991, and I have never reproduced, nor taken part in the act of procreation. None of the points of view I have expressed herein specifically advocate for any policies put forth during the Baby Boom, unless, of course, you mean to suggest that the entire notion of stratified credibility were somehow peculiar to that generation, though it was already in deplorable decline then. Regarding stratified credibility, it ought to be obvious that in approaching an intellectual problem one ought to prioritize opinions informed by education and practice, especially in contending with laypeople who claim a difference to be negligible. Invariably, such negligence is the province of extremely dismissive ignoramuses, whose nature and project it is to undermine the disciplined pursuit of Truth.

[({R.G.)}]

One cannot pay people upfront without creating the possibility for the employee to underperform, and that sheer possibility creates for the employer an excuse to exploit the labour of the employee. Since the employer is himself only employed by his superiors or by the market, the incentive is all too tempting to pawn off the work of one’s employees as one’s own whilst underrating the employee’s performance. For these reasons, in the Spirit of creating a non-aggressive work environment, employers must adhere to payment “in the backend”, in direct proportion to the success of the project, according to a ratio previously agreed upon with the employee. This both creates the incentive for the project to succeed as well as eliminating any set of circumstances wherein the employer should “judge the performance” of the employee, thereby impeding any sort of success, spiritual or material, by the imposition of the employer’s biases. Such an arbitration only dooms the “work” to the fate of the “play”: a performance, put on for show and profit, but with marginal Investment.

[({Dm.A.A.)}]