Monday, December 11, 2017

MICHAEL SCOTT: UNSUNG HERO of the OFFICE.

MICHAEL SCOTT: UNSUNG HERO of the OFFICE.

Netflix describes the United States version of Sitcom The Office as a “hit comedy [that] chronicles the foibles of disgruntled office workers – led by delusional [sic] boss Michael Scott – at the Dunder Mifflin Paper Company.” This classic, which ran for 192 Episodes, has recently caught my eye again since it came up on my sister’s Netflix account. True to form, and trustful of my sister’s judgment, I picked up where she left off, partway through early Season Two. It did not take long for me to take kindly to it, partly out of nostalgia (and surprise that I had seen so many of these episodes hitherto) and partly out of novelty. When I first watched this show in High School, Michael was the laughing stock of not only the fictional Office Staff (with the exception of his sycophantic, psychopathic Assistant [to the] Regional Manager, Dwight K. Schrute, who is second in both command and ridicule) but all so of millions of living rooms and Office Desktops throughout the World. Now, knowing that Michael is customarily typed as an E.N.F.P. (the Champion), and with due cause to HATE his Type, I thought that the show might provide me with some sort of spiteful closure as I berated the protagonist for his Outgoing Antics. Yet the more that leading actor Steve Carrel’s face fell on camera in this ironical, post-modern mockumentary, the more my own Spirits sagged. Not only was I robbed of the throne of spite by my incurable SYMPATHY for Michael Scott. I ALL so found myself defending him, not without some degree of egoic self-defensiveness. I quickly adopted him as a sort of Favourite Character and Role Model that I would root for in every episode against odds that, to the both of us, seemed totally insurmountable. Jim, the friendly Everyman that dates cheerleaders and pines for Pam the Receptionist, became my sworn enemy, seconded only by the wry, cynical Human Resources Manager, Toby. Every cutting remark made against Michael Scott was a dart not only in HIS Heart, but mine. But I put off writing this review of Season Two until I finished watching what is now my favourite episode of this show: “Michael’s Birthday” (Season Two, Episode Nineteen. Yes: 19 happens to be one of my Favourite Numbers. This is neither coincidence nor contrivance; it’s called a SYNCHRONICITY. I’ll explain later.)
It All Made Sense when Michael mentioned that he shared a birthday with Eva Longoria. The subtext was just too perfect. I knew Eva, of course, to be a Pisces, and I would often think back to her whenever I thought to blame my Sign of Birth for any marital difficulties I encountered, especially in competition with the other water signs. (May the record show that I still find Katy Perry gorgeous, my own gripes and her own reputation notwithstanding.) So Michael Scott has my sign. Is that such a bad thing? No. I do not believe so. And neither do the writers for the Show, who make their mark at the end of the episode through the voice of Pam Beasley. Pam demonstrates an unprecedented TOLERANCE for Michael when she admits, against her own inclinations, (as tends to be her hang-up about Dwight as well, because she shares an ongoing, running Inside Joke* about them with her de facto lover Jim) that Michael’s Birthday turned out to be a Good Day.
*Though to be honest there is little hidden in this Office, and least of all is the fact that Michael and Dwight are “laughable”.

My thesis is simple: Michael Scott is the HERO of the program. Every Good Thing that happens in the show is the result of his antics, for which he is usually blamed and only very seldom rewarded. And I maintain that the writers maintain this as the main underlying theme, in the same fashion as the writers of Breaking Bad knew what Walt’s True Motives were, etc. It’s called subtext, people. And I can prove my point using only episodes from the first twenty episodes of Season Two.

PART ONE: JIM AND PAM.

The Scranton, Pennsylvania Office of Dunder Mifflin is far from professional, and so barely devoid of erotic entanglements. Without a doubt, the Fan Favourite of all Couplings on this show are Jim Halpert and Pam Beasley. I even know a barista, who has been married to her elementary school sweetheart for several years now, who insists that her favourite character on the show is “Jim and Pam, but as a couple”. Individually, Jim and Pam are intolerably normal in persona. Jim, the Libra, and without a doubt an E.N.F.J, (if not an E.S.T.J.) seems to pride himself in being what a robot’s conception of a normal person would be. Pam, a slightly and subtly delusional Sagittarian with unresolved ambitions for a Life of Travel and Miracles, is engaged to a Warehouse Worker (at the same company) named Roy. Roy is an “Everyman” in every sense of the word “bro”; his idea of the Ideal Valentine’s Gift for his fiancée is “the best sex of [her] life”, a promise he delivers across her Receptionist’s Counter with a corny grin worthy of Southern Theatre, to which Pam responds with a ravaged frown nearly devoid of restraint and discipline. (To be clear: Pam will NOT be receiving the Best Sex of Her Life from Roy. Just to be clear.) Clearly: Pam’s Sagittarian Optimism could reach Mythic Proportions. She has, after all, endured three years of formal engagement with Roy, an ongoing and unresolved marital promise that is the initial barrier to Jim and Pam’s budding Office Romance. To quote Peter Quill from the Guardians of the Galaxy: they have an “Unspoken Thing”. And this is the primary incentive for girls of high school age and men of Romantic Temperament to return to the otherwise dreary Office week after week, at times even on a television binge. Pam’s Loyalty can all so be traced to her Personality Type, which I have identified as I.S.F.J. She cares for Roy because he is flawed. But she cares for Jim because Jim is relatable. And because they have their Inside Jokes. But they remain “just friends” for the greater part of two entire seasons.

Delusions of Adequacy hold the young paper salesman and his neighbouring Receptionist together; they both seem to have committed the Fallacy of Normalcy about themselves, about each other, and about most of their coworkers. Their vanity is low-key, but not beyond the probing gaze of Dwight, who sits at Jim’s left hand, and the less probing but nonetheless intrusive gaze of Michael Scott, who seldom hesitates to point out Pam’s breasts. Jim and Pam make a sport out of mocking Michael and Dwight, remaining within the boundaries of convention but still demonstrating an insensitivity that at times borders on the pathological. In turn, Dwight ridicules Jim, upsetting Jim’s Rational Sensibilities by running Reason to its Absurd Extremes. All the while Michael hits on Pam, harmlessly, of course (in terms of competition for Jim) but not without threatening the Politically Correct Comfort Zone that the young nerd has come to rely upon (chiefly as the result of repressing her own Wild Nature under the burden of a stultifying relationship that survives off of the Force of Habit Alone). Both Dwight and Michael challenge not only Jim and Pam, nor merely the Office, but the entirety of the Audience to take a side: Normality or Individuality? We wait for Pam or Jim to crack and to show some sign of idiosyncrasy that, theoretically, they took this job in order to escape. And we dread the possibility that the Mad Men of the Office will come to their senses like Don Quixote de la Mancha, at which point the fun is over, and Life in Grey begins again.
Of course: we would not root for Jim and Pam if they were not “a good couple”. Together, they are greater than the sum of their parts. Like Romeo and Juliet, they are stupid when left to their individual devices, but a work of literary genius when in dialogue. OF COURSE: this makes them a much healthier pair than the all most suggestive pairing of Michael Scott and Dwight Schrute. Jim and Pam survive as an unspoken couple off of jokes typically at Dwight and Michael’s expense, and they more than often cope with Michael in particular by strengthening their dependency upon one an other.

But where would they be without Michael??

The Chief Barrier for Jim and Pam is of course not Roy, nor is it their individual idiosyncrasies, which vary, and so function as adjacent walls but not the Main Partition that separates them. (Nor is this Main Partition Pam’s Desk, though the Visual Metaphor does work.) The Barrier is: Secrecy.
Secrecy is not only permitted in a Corporate Office Setting, nor is it merely encouraged. It is ENFORCED. One of the ironical and theatrical things about Michael Scott is that he is INCAPABLE OF SECRECY. With him, there IS no bag for the cat to jump out of. While this works in his short-term disfavor, it works to the benefit of every one else over the Long Term, and insofar as Plato was right and Virtue is Its Own Reward, it serves to empower our conception of Michael as a Character, rather than just a Person (most specifically: The Archetypal Fool), granted we are blessed with moral discernment.
Michael is not only incapable of keeping his mouth shut about things he finds hilarious, terrifying, or otherwise exciting. He is all so THE WORST LIAR in the entire Office. Every one around him lies, usually in the form of white lies towards one an other, but most dramatically towards Michael himself. Jim even manages to throw a House Warming party for the entire Office, only excluding one person: their boss, Michael Scott. Even DWIGHT is invited to the Party, and when the loyal Assistant Regional Manager catches wind of the fact that Michael has been left out, Jim tells Dwight that the Party is a Surprise FOR Michael. Jim, your average Libra, with all due respect, lies compulsively.
Jim’s compulsive lying of course hurts more people than he knows about. In trying to be the Lovable Libra (regardless of whether or not he acknowledges his own Astrological Identity) Jim not only scapegoats Michael, the optimistic Black Sheep of the otherwise cynical and dreary Office. He all so lies to every one by hiding his feelings for Pam. And the damage this does to both of them is aggravated by the fact that Pam repeats the lie, denying that either Jim loves her or that she loves Jim.
Thankfully, Michael is to their Wall of Secrecy what Fate was to the Berlin Wall.

CHRISTMAS:

Christmas comes to the Office of Scranton’s Dunder Mifflin Branch in Episode Number Fourteen. At this time Michael sabotages the Christmas Gift Exchange by turning it suddenly into a White Elephant exchange. His motive is jealousy; he bought an iPod for Oscar, going far outside the allotted budget per gift, and his pride was affronted by a hand-knit mitten gifted to him be Phyllis, the warm and aging “Mother Goose” of the Office who is most probably a closet Wiccan. (What short of witchcraft could have produced that slew of Valentine’s Day Gifts that left Pam envious?)
As per usual, Michael is passively berated by his fellows for his selfishness, at times even overtly, throughout the competition that follows. We forget that he bought the iPod, which every one wants, with some fraction of that Bonus that he got from firing an employee (under orders from his Superior and Lover Jan, with much chagrin, and to his ultimate disadvantage) in an earlier episode. We might suspect Michael’s motives as containing self-interest, and rightfully so, for it is clear that he expected a more rewarding gift in exchange. But we are in no ways justified in REDUCING him to self-interest. A sort of laissez-faire Marxist at Heart, Michael does not hold his recipient in any sort of debt to him; that debt is in turn passed off to his own Secret Santa. Michael does not want to COERCE generosity; he simply EXPECTS others to have his OWN, and that is in part, of course, an extension of his own Generosity of Opinion about his Employees and “Friends”. His only tragic flaw is that he measures Generosity in Money, because he has neither the interpersonal skills nor the practical skills to produce a hand-made product with sentimental value. Part of this owes to the fact that he is, after all, a Salesman. He is all so a Helper in the Enneagram sense, rather than a Provider. He wants something back, but not for a lack of altruism; rather it is out of a desire for Justice, and Injustice towards one’s self is often the easiest to identify in a state of shock and disappointment.
So, what does this mean for Jim and Pam? you might ask.
The effect of Michael’s decision to turn Secret Santa into a White Elephant is that it TESTS PAM’S LOYALTY to JIM. Jim is her Secret Santa, and his gift is a tea pot that Pam wanted but never bought, stuffed with personal trinkets representing Inside Jokes that only Jim and Pam would get, accompanied by what is surely a love letter, as Jim says it’s the time of year to tell someone “how you feel”.
Dwight is astute in making this observation: that White Elephant is like “Machiavelli meets Christmas”. Every one competes for the iPod until Pam winds up with it; only Kevin, the hebephrenic, seems to have past it up, a choice that he regrets. Of all the competitive office workers, Dwight proves the most Machiavellian, as the tide of self-interest raises his buoy and he takes things to his usual Extreme. Jim is hard-pressed to get the tea pot back from Dwight, who in the absence of a personal use for it INVENTS one, almost as though to spite Jim’s clearly communicated sentimental reasons for the bargain.
Of course: Dwight ultimately TRADES the tea pot to Pam, who rationalizes the deal when Roy tells her that he had intended to get her an iPod for Christmas. Pam’s alibi checks out, of course; she wants, with stifled desperation, to believe that her fiancé will deliver, and the alternative is murky, so getting what the I.S.F.J. all ready wants would be nice and practical. Yet as John Guare put it, the Kandinsky is painted on both sides: Pam doubts, deep down, that Roy could EVER satisfy her, and she honours Jim’s informal loyalty to her, made more romantic by its informality, above any generic material gift that Roy could promise her or that she could herself imagine.
Michael’s Bold and Risky Move does wonders in the long run. Not only does Pam prove her loyalty to Jim. ROY proves his DISLOYALTY to PAM, because when the day comes Pam receives NOT an iPod but a cheap and cumbersome, block-shaped knock-off that she can’t figure out how to use. Might Pam’s hopes have been dashed had she not held the iPod in her hands for several hours or so? There is no reasonable doubt that she would have been spared the disappointment, for it’s unlikely that Roy would have even MENTIONED an iPod otherwise.
The fun does not stop there. Michael’s stunt all so buys Jim some more time to make his feelings known*, as Jim steals the love letter back from Pam without her noticing, motivated by what I imagine to be a mixture of Doubt on the Conscious Level that she loves him back, and Conviction on the Unconscious Level that she does, for though she waivered initially she made a big sacrifice in the long run by settling for the tea pot. He probably suspects, deep down, that Roy will disappoint her, and that she knows that as well as he does, though just as far down. Does this keep the wall up? Yes. But it is not long before Michael tears it to shreds.

*Although this is technically PROCRASTINATION rather than an EXTENDED DEADLINE, we might guess that something so premature would have been chaotic and overwhelming to an all ready deeply confused Pam Beasley.

As an addendum, I should note that Michael saves the day at the Christmas Party. He buys about a dozen bottles of Vodka for the Office, using his own Bonus, and throws a barely legal (okay: totally against the rules) bash that everyone enjoys and GETS AWAY WITH, unscathed and unnoticed by their Superiors. He even passes up an opportunity to engage in sex with Meredith the Alcoholic, settling only for a photograph of her breasts.

THE CRUISE:

The following episode is called “Booze Cruise”, and it is just that. The Company Party is set (by Michael Scott) on a party boat in January, and Michael takes on the role of Captain of the Cruise. Unfortunately, Michael does not count on the ship’s Actual Captain all so being an Alpha Douche. Captain Jack is a retired Naval Officer, and he presides over not only the Party Boat but over the Party Itself. As the occupants of the vessel schmooze and booze, Michael fights for their attention over the obnoxious Captain Jack, who manipulatively (and with Nationalistic Integrity) reminds Michael to be “considerate of others” on the Cruise. The preaching implies a Moral Superiority to Michael by avenue of claiming that whilst Michael represents a negligible SECT of the Cruise, perhaps even a potentially oppressive majority, the Captain represents Every One Aboard. The All-Inclusive Ethos I am sympathetic to, but the ends do not justify the means: Humiliating MICHAEL in front of the ENTIRE CROWD, employees et AL. Leaders must honour other Leaders, and not all differences in Leadership are differences in Rank. But good luck telling a hired and glorified Hit Man that, especially when he has “Leadership Experience” leading troops to “victory” in Operation Desert Storm, and his business is not only to protect his underlings but to terrify and even murder any one operating under Equal and Opposing Leadership. Keep that in mind as Captain Jack trivializes Michael’s heroic attempts to be diplomatic in turning the Booze Cruise into a brief seminar, which is, after all, what Michael’s TRUE Supervisor is signing off on. But apparently Limbo is more important. Of course: it’s not like Captain Jack is sympathetic and gender-neutral in how he regards INDIVIDUAL occupants of his boat, as he lets on “subtly” when Dwight volunteers to hold the Limbo Stick. (For Some Unknown Reason, the game of bending over backwards drunk is more RIVETING when a FEMALE is holding the pole.) Our Machiavellian Party Host puts Dwight in charge of “steering the ship”, humouring Dwight’s delusions of power and honour whilst the Actual Navigator continues up above. It is in fact not until Michael tells Dwight, at the end of the episode, that the Steering Wheel is a fake that the Truth comes to Light. Thankfully, this is not the only Revelation made throughout the journey.
Both Jim and Pam invite their dates to the Party. Pam invites Roy, and Jim invites a former aforementioned cheerleader. They share a table, amused and dimly alarmed by their boss’s antics, and brought together in camaraderie by both the comedy and the catharsis. Yet things take a decisive and divisive turn when Captain Jack sits down at the bar to have a drink with Michael and Roy, the latter of whom has ditched Pam to get intoxicated. Michael and Jack compete for the smaller crowd at the bar, and Jack wins by boasting his “leadership skills” in the War. His boast inspires Roy, who is now sufficiently impassioned by his own Patriotism, as well as hammered, to reach a redneck’s degree of impulsiveness. On a whim, Roy gets up to the microphone that has been the coveted love object of both Jack and Michael in their sibling rivalry and announces that he has decided to finally set a date for his wedding with Pam. The promise, three years into an indefinite engagement, is tantamount to a Proposal.
Whilst Captain Jack sneaks off to fuck Meredith, about whom nothing more needs to be said, Michael makes a desperate attempt to save his reputation (and his review) by announcing that the Ship is Sinking. As per usual, the immediate effects are unsettling; one man even jumps overboard, though it is implied that he survives. All so as per usual, Michael’s ruse is short-lived to the point that we might pardon the lie, which is promptly punished when Jack comes back followed by Meredith, who is naked save for her Life Preserving Floatation Jacket. Michael spends some part of the remainder of the Cruise sequestered to some indistinct part of the ship, but thankfully he finds company when Jim, who has been drinking since he heard Roy’s impassioned public ejaculation, does the unthinkable and keeps Michael company. It is at this point that Jim confesses his love for Pam to Michael, about which Michael Scott, a self-professed expert on the Human Heart, was clueless, and about which he is now amused. In a moment of touching and revealing clarity, which Alan Watts ascribes to most Divine Fools, (“Now you see it; now you don’t.”) Michael encourages Jim to never give up, reminding him that Engagement is not Marriage. And besides: we all remember that Michael’s own Light of Love is as of recently divorced. But that I shall cover a little further down the list of Praises.

As one last stab at the proto-Fascist Captain Jack: the man has no doubt that when a boat is sinking women and children should be saved first. Children I understand, but “women” is a little dated in egalitarian society. Keep in mind: Jan, Mike’s boss and paramour, would all most certainly agree with me, at least in Ethos, if not under duress of the fact. (Fortune makes fools of us all.) It is Captain Jack’s advice that prompts Michael to turn the hypothetical example into a metaphor that is then taken literally by the sheepish occupants of the boat, most notably the man who jumps overboard. IT IS ALL so this that prompts Jim to realize and to confess that he himself personally would “save the Receptionist”. And were it not for Michael’s taking the initiative, attempting to discuss leadership in the midst of the controlled chaos of Captain Jack’s Ship, Jim might have neither broken up with his girlfriend on that same night, in the same hour of the Proposal, nor confided in his eccentric boss. Michael Scott gets all the blame and keeps none of the credit, except to the Discerning Viewer and Auditor. I personally bestow upon him all the credit for what good follows between Jim and Pam, and I absolve him of any karmic debt for the Man Overboard. Supposing, of course, that I have that authority. If it comes down to me or Jack Mussolini, I think I will win. As far as I can choose my OWN Leaders, I certainly choose Michael.

THE SECRET:
Michael lasts one episode before spilling the beans about Jim and Pam. He does not mean to, but he cannot help it. After taking Jim out to Hooters for Lunch, joking extensively (of course) about the server’s Breasts, and even pretending that it’s Jim’s birthday, (again: Jim is a Libra, so no.) Michael is stopped by his arch-nemesis: Toby the Human Resources Manager. Toby refuses to sign off on the receipt, for which Michael paid with Company Money. Michael puts up a noble fight, insisting that the expense was a matter of necessity and that he was himself looking out for an employee’s well-being. We know Michael to be a Generous Person, by now, so we don’t doubt, if we are ourselves nearly as Generous, that he WOULD have paid for the Lunch out of his own pocket. But Mike hates Toby, and when the passion of a Leader for his Followers is mixed with the passion to oppose an Adversary, and when Nobility must vanquish Moral Inferiority to save not only a Victim but the Ideal Itself, as well as to save the Leader from Victimhood, Truth comes to the front line. Michael blurts out that Jim is depressed because he is in love with a woman who works in this same Office who is about to get married. And as it turns out, Toby’s neighbour in the cubicle, present at her station at that moment, happens to be the most neurotic Gossip in the entire Office.

Jim enjoyed the Lunch, his initial reservations notwithstanding, and when he shows Pam his new Hooters tee shirt she tells him lovingly that she hates him for mocking her. When news spreads that Jim likes Pam, he is quick to recover, telling everyone, camera crew included, that he had a crush on her when they first started working together, but that it has since run its course and tapered (or expanded) into a friendship. Jim is the quintessential liar because he even fools himself, and if HE’S fooled, Pam is even more so. But the Unspoken Thing does not abate. When Pam visits Michael in Michael’s Office Michael apologizes so profusely that she is embarrassed, even going so far as to “assure” her boss that Jim’s “crush” is no longer relevant. Michael, at that moment, true to form, corrects her. When he sees the look of wonder on her face that follows, he does what only so proficient a liar would do: he tells himself, quite openly and loudly, to shut up and to stop talking to people.

It’s not long after Pam talks to Jim about this, and they exchange lies in denial of their feelings, that Jim realizes he’s not over her at ALL, and he arranges to be out of the Country on the day of her Wedding. Needless to say: I doubt that this will go as planned. And I don’t doubt that Michael will play some role in making sure, by force of nature rather than conscious intent, that such plans go awry.

PART TWO: DWIGHT AND ANGELA.
If any one could truly rival Michael’s sense of loyalty and heroism to a pathological degree, it is his Assistant Dwight Kurt Schrute III. Dwight was a favourite of my High School Graduating Class for a reason. Born on January 20th, a birthday he shares with David Lynch, Bill Maher, Federico Fellini, and Rainn Wilson, Dwight embodies that precarious ideal balance of Conservatism and Idiosyncrasy that Astrologers call the Cusp of Mystery. My fellows with North Node in Capricorn ate him up mostly.
Dwight all so exemplifies, to me, what most people think an E.N.T.J. is, and what I WISH an E.N.T.J. truly were. His Will to Power is transparent, but he can all ways back it up with a personal anecdote and a bizarre ancient (or even contemporary!) superstition. His talents are endless, and he perseveres in their perfection against all criticism, stopping only to honour his superiors. Jim has a field day sitting next to Dwight, and Pam meanwhile finds reprieve from frazzled ennui and pre-marital depression by sneaking glances at his highly contained affair with Angela the Accountant. Their romance serves as a character foil for Jim and Pam. Not only are these the last two people that we expect to give in to the Power of Love, surrendering the Love of Power. They all so succeed where Jim and Pam fail, and this irony is hard for the young star-crossed lovebirds to ignore.
Angela is an I.N.T.J, and that’s the end of the discussion. The slender, middle-aged blonde comes off at first glance as a schizoaffective outpatient whose every gesture of human kindness leaves us eerily suspicious of her motives. As the series progresses, we grow to understand that she is really just a hyper-introverted neat freak who is revolted by most of her surroundings and suffers daily to not only put up with the idiocy of her neighbours but to hide her own idiosyncrasies from their hypocritical judgments*. When the aforementioned Gossip, Kelly, receives Angela’s Christmas gift from Toby, in whom Angela saw fit to confide at some point given his reserved nature, Kelly condemns Angela’s taste, the only benefit of which is that Angela gets to keep the gift intended for her: a poster of babies dressed up as adults playing musical instruments. More psychoanalytic viewers will understand very quickly why Angela has a thing for art depicting babies masquerading as adults. But I will leave that up for more conventional readers and viewers to un-riddle for themselves.
*Is Angela herself hypocritical for being judgmental? At least she remains close-LIPPED about it! As best as she can.
Needless to say, but needful as a segue: Dwight and Angela are a match made in Valhalla. But their love comes at a cost: no one must ever know. And ironically enough, this secrecy is preserved by the very man who cannot keep it: Michael Scott.

THE PARTY:

One would think that a man like Michael Scott would prize the only other man in the Office who believes in him, but Michael is not so easily bought. The dynamic between Dwight and Michael is not only suggestive but perverse; Dwight honours Michael as a sensei (LITERALLY) and Michael does not even give a fuck about what that word really means. Be that as it may, every good thing that happens to Dwight Michael does, and every good thing that Dwight does he does for Michael.
I have spoken previously of a House Warming Party that Jim throws, whose solitary persona non grata is Michael Scott. Jim rationalizes this with Fascistic dexterity by insisting that Michael’s “authority” might be intimidating to employees. Of course: Jim just really does not want to hang out with Michael. And let’s not presume an Everyman can’t be a Fascist. At some point Jim even writes a speech for Dwight, which is predominantly an adaptation of Benito Mussolini.
As aforementioned, only Dwight cares. Michael, who has been cyber-stalking the entire Office, knows about the Party, but he is embarrassed to admit to this breach of their Privacy. Of course, Michael can’t contain the secret that he has been reading their e-mails, but the breach of privacy is consistent with his whistle-blowing tendencies and attributes. When Michael’s attempts to level with his employees fall flat, he resolves himself to his earlier plans: Friday Night Improvisational Acting Classes. There is no doubt to our eye that he is the Best of his colleagues in this department. The other students ape and ham every gesture, accruing each other’s support only by force of mutual weakness. Michael alone stands out and shines. This owes to one fact: Michael has only one shtick, and it involves a Gun. Every story that he tells is interrupted by the appearance of a firearm in his imaginary possession. Of all the Improv Actors, Michael Scott is the only one whose work is truly Spontaneous. All though the shtick is familiar, all too familiar to him and his audience of collaborators, it is NOVEL and UNEXPECTED in each scene. If he had to give only one performance as an Improvisational Actor, and that Performance were the Performance of a Lifetime, he would nail it to the ceiling with his autotypecast style, and this nail in the ceiling would bring the house down in hysterics. Nothing is as effective at SURPRISING the AUDIENCE as a sudden bodily threat to the characters, and Michael understands that. Sure: it’s simple and redundant. So were ZZ Top. So was Elvis. And Tarantino, who seems to think guns are cool, too. The fact is that by formalizing this as his Thing, he ensures that his work is in NO WAY RELEVANT to the context of the existing narrative. And this is one of the Highest Virtues in Modern Art: that it breaks with the force of karma. Man’s entire folly seems to be that he responds to the Present in terms of the Past. Social Darwinism all ways reminds us that this is permissible by society because society follows basically Animal Behaviour. What sets us apart from beasts if not our ability to Learn New Tricks? Michael does not Learn new tricks, but as a performer, he is not the target*. For an Audience, supposing that that audience is not included in the cast and crew, the Gun is New, and should the show be regular, it would amount to a beloved Running Joke. Michael does not Learn novelty; he TEACHES it by force of his own habit. He sacrifices for the Audience. *Although his fellows berate his self-interest as THOUGH he were attempting to enthrone himself as the target of the project, the Audience (in this case, television fans) LOVES him for not only the fruits but the roots of his genius. And God, does he OWN the Role. It owns HIM. That’s how much he is married to it.
This is why the writer of this essay no longer debates intercollegiately. Every competition confines its audience to other debaters and their few spectators. The judges are all veteran debaters and public speakers. So are the coaches. It’s mortifying. It is like a Cult. And knowing people who major in Communications and who Act in Improv on the side, I do not doubt that Improv is just as Cultish. Hence BoJack Horseman uses it to satirize Scientology. But that’s a story for an other time and place.

If you thought Jim and Co. were bad for leaving Michael out, you should see how BLATANTLY DITCHED he gets by his fellows in the Improv. Class. Apparently, a mutual friend that knows everyone in the group except for Michael invited them to hang out without him, and no one had the power to extend the invitation. If this has ever happened to you, you might have wondered if YOU were the Problem, maybe. Jesus surely had similar doubts when Satan told him to jump off a terrace or something. But we all know that it’s not our fault that the World is cruel, except when we are cruel. Michael can’t change himself; he is too full of himself. And that is where his integrity lies. He is the best actor in the group, and he steals the show because he never deviates. Deep down, he is all ways the same, whatever hare-brained schemes he might devise, and in that sense he is Authentic to a Fault. But it is not HIS Fault, but the Fault of those who Pretend to be what they are not, such as Jim and Pam.

Long story short: Michael shows up. Dwight welcomes him. Michael owns at Karaoke. He sings in pitch, he sings with passion, and he even sings the female voice when no woman present has the courage to do the duet with him. Finally, Jim Himself rises to sing with Michael, singing the female part with some degree of tenderness and to Pam’s expanding amusement. Michael and Jim harmonize, knowing the song MOSTLY by Heart, and as they serenade their coworkers and Jim’s room-mates and other friends, the camera zooms in on two pairs of shoes. Dwight and Angela, unnoticed as the Crowd sits transfixed, are making out, if not even making love.

THE ACCIDENT:

Michael’s Piscean sensitivity is most easily demonstrated in an Episode entitled “The Injury”. The title refers ambiguously to TWO injuries at once: Michael burns his foot on his George Foreman Grille, and Dwight gets a concussion on his way to rush to his Master’s Aid. (Against, mind you, the Master’s Expressed Wishes.)
People often mistake Pisceans for being insensitive, but that is only because there is so much going on at one moment that Total Attention is hard to give to any one part of the problem. An injured Pisces may easily forget the sorrows of the World, because his own pain BECOMES the World. It’s not like we did not warn you: Don’t. Send. Dwight.
It’s fascinating to ponder the fact that the Sign of Pisces rules the Feet. At some point in the episode, Michael Scott asks a physician whether a foot injury is more serious than a brain injury. The doctor does not hesitate to say the latter, though in truth Michael’s question could be summed up as a ZEN koan: why presume the one to rule the other? Is the body not a true democracy? Where would the head be without the foot? So on and so forth. But it’s a pity to say so.
Despite being told repeatedly that his injury is negligible, and in spite of his seeming indifference to the well-being of the man who rubbed oil on his burnt foot, Michael knows what we don’t know: that Dwight is not only FINE, but that he will be Better Off.
Immediately following his injury to the Head, which he incurs after he crashes his car into a pole and then runs into the same, Dwight becomes friendly to all of his coworkers. Pam is even alarmed to discover that Dwight has “kind of” become her friend. Even after treatment, the normally authoritarian Assistant Manager retains a certain unprecedented joie de vie. Most notably, he flirts more openly with Angela, whilst at the same time managing to keep their relationship private and professional. When Jan comes in to coach the women of Scranton’s Branch on being assertive, Angela scoffs inwardly, insisting later in an interview that she is engaged in the “healthiest relationship” she has had for a while.

PART THREE: MICHAEL AND JAN.

Jan is Michael’s boss, though Michael is not Jan’s bitch. Jan Levinson, formerly Jan Levinson-Gould, is not herself any one’s bitch, but that is only because her own Will to Power is so pronounced. The Iron Lady of Dunder Mifflin is in many ways your archetypal Corporate Feminist, and the show takes liberties with her hypocritical feminism that would not fly in today’s forgetful decade.
Jan has only one sentimental weakness: Michael loves her, and she cannot resist being loved BY him. Her ardent attempts to maintain a professional distance from him turn eventually to so searing a rage that one is reminded of a dominatrix addressing her gimp. In the wildly satirical episode “Boys and Girls”, she takes over Michael’s Conference Room in order to coach Pam, Meredith, Kelly, Angela, and Phyllis on how to be Strong Women in the Work Force. Meanwhile, Michael tries to host a Man’s Meeting in the space outside the Conference Room, and the rowdiness of his rallying compels Jan to move the Men’s Meeting to the Warehouse. It is not long thereafter that Michael is pressured by Warehouse workers to represent their interests in forming a Union. Just as Jan is about to lecture her girls (most of whom are of a rather Maternal temperament) about wage disparity, Michael wafts in to tell her that the Warehouse is about to Unionize. In turn, Jan STORMS downstairs to tell the Warehouse Workers exactly why they will NOT be Unionizing, dismissing their intent as some futile attempt to send a pointless message, and she instructs them to direct all their complaints to Michael. She returns upstairs, perhaps to finish lecturing on wage disparity and the importance of bridging it, to avoid personal questions about Michael, and to remind her girls at Dunder Mifflin to be “assertive”, because apparently when women are “assertive” they are not met with the PRAISE that assertive men (like Michael) get. But then: perhaps Michael is just not the Assertive Type. Though can being an American Margaret Thatcher be classified as “assertive” instead of “aggressive”? What does she ASSERT by blaming Michael?
Thankfully, Michael loves her as a dog does. Though he never is her bitch. And with his help, she learns to love again as well. The two of them want the same things. She divorced because she wanted children, and she’d hoped she could “persuade” her now-ex-husband to agree. He just never married, though he’d wanted to have kids since he was ten years old or so.
Herein lies their story so far:

[Okay. So I’ve been sitting on twenty-two pages of gold (NOT Pyrite) here since Thursday morning at what Google Drive tells me was 3:35 A.M. I obviously have a lot more to say on the matter, expounding on Jan and Michael, touching on Oscar (not in That Way) and Kevin (Neither), and just barely scraping the tip of the Iceberg where Kelly and Ryan (whose actors co-wrote the show) are concerned, consolidating my theory that every time Mindy Kaling gets involved in B.J. Novak’s work Michael becomes the Hero and Kelly and Ryan come closer as Ryan’s cynicism is spared by the mercy of his more Affective, if obnoxious, Coworkers. But it’s all ready Tuesday, and I am all ready four story-arcs (sixteen episodes) into Season Three. If I can see it by now, you can, too, without any further aid. But I shall possibly Keep You Posted, with Quixotic Optimism and, of course, the precision of a Schrute.]


Dm.A.A.

Tuesday, December 5, 2017

A HUMANE END to VILE DEMOCRACY:

I will never support the Institution of Voting. Some would have the tenacity to say that if I do not vote my voice won’t matter. The reality of it is this: that my voice MATTERS, so I won’t have it drowned out in a mob of brainless zombies.

I love my fate, but I cannot condone it in good faith. All my life I have been outvoted, and I’ve watched the people who spited me fail. Sometimes, even Death would result. And I would be blamed as the dissenter, even AFTER my Power was stolen from me by a crowd of parasites.

It has all so occurred to me that the most Parasitic of this Lot tend to be the ones who lead the pack. They PRETEND to represent the Group, but in fact they simply ENABLE the Group and REPRESENT themselves. They achieve this only by ENABLING the individual MEMBERS of that group to surrender their conscience and accountability, asserting their self-interest over an oppressed Minority, hiding their OWN Minority and Individuality in the brainless mass. Sometimes, the “Group” that forms – otherwise known as a Mob – engages in a meaningless and seemingly endless war with an other Group. Overall, this habit is referred to as “voting”. It is a fluke of evolution, arising out of the tribal midbrain and bypassing the Rational Neo Cortex.

An empath can never condone this practice, except where a Unanimous Vote is necessary for action to be implemented. Any thing less would be Animalistic Behaviour under the mere GUISE of Civility. The condition of being outvoted is unbearable when one is IN THE RIGHT, and the entire Institution of INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS is meant to PRESERVE the POWER of the Elite Minority that seems invariably to arise in the midst of any barbaric Group.

The evil is aggravated by the sheer number of the majority, which draws its power NOT from Reason or Empathy but from its very SOURCE of evil: the number. Let this not be mistaken for a tautology. It is simply an irony. There is nothing here to be “proven” that is not all ready self-evident to any one who has suffered marginalization and forceful oppression by a Group.

It is not uncommon for Voters (as a Personality Type, in the same fashion as Sadism or Borderline are Personality Types) to make reference to some Scapegoat. If it is not a perceived minority, such as the Jews, it is an even smaller one, at times even an Individual, such as Adolf Hitler. By projecting Evil upon ONE man, every Voter dispossesses himself of his OWN PERSONAL evil. An individual may harbour individual shortcomings, such as malice or cruelty, but unfortunately he may be UNAWARE of them because, as a member of the GROUP, he is UNAWARE OF HIS OWN INDIVIDUALITY. So he can never take RESPONSIBILITY for his own shortcomings, and if he cannot join in others in condemning the Average Kike or Nigger, for instance, then he must one-up the Average Bigot by condemning an even GREATER Bigot: Adolf Hitler.
The irony is that Hitler pedestalized the Jews as much as he was himself put on a pedestal. Nazism runs on the notion that there is ALL READY AN ELITE MINORITY IN PLACE (such as the Jewish Bankers) but that this is somehow A BAD THING. So the People, led by an Everyman who KNOWS that he can lead a Majority, get together, and what do they do? THEY VOTE. And once the Man of the People (in this case: Hitler.) is voted into Office, he can use whatever means are necessary to SERVE THE PEOPLE. Only that is at the EXPENSE of a MINORITY who is now no longer COUNTED AS People. And while I ardently reserve the right to depersonalize any one that I choose, based on due cause, I will never defend the rights of a MOB to do so. A Mob has no rights. There is no “society”; there is only the Individual. What the PEOPLE WANT is invariably the projection of the Individual Psyche longing for Solidarity that DOES NOT EXIST, because it is founded upon self-interest and malice. What other name but MALICE can be ascribed to the man who claims that the Better Society has More Happy People, and fewer Unhappy Ones? After all: the smaller the out-group that suffers, the greater the suffering. The Disgruntled Minority, when dispossessed of being the Elite Minority, is either exterminated or forced into a sort of prison where in they* are made to LOOK NORMAL so as to appease the Public and SUPPRESSED so as not to threaten the Collective Happiness. But it is needless to say that an EMPATH could never condone this, for Every Human Life Matters, regardless of whether one prefers to be Happy or Miserable. And if Misery loves Company, it is every bit as Social an Emotion as Happiness. If not even more so.

*Although “Minority” is singular, the members of this out-group are Plural, because they remain Individuals, and an “out-group” of this sort is all so a sort of “ungroup”.

Extraverted critics of Hitler, including the most Brilliant and Inspired, often make the same mistakes in analyzing his ascent to Power. They pretend, for instance, that Democracy has something “built into it” like a Computer Bug: (a certain Public Speaking professor I knew, who all so happened to be a programmer, used this analogy, albeit by allusion that I had to trace back to his techie roots by inference) that when the People do not Want Democracy, it fails. This is based on the presupposition, rightfully, that Democracy relies on What the People Want, even though this is of course Pure Abstraction, because only a highly gifted Psychic could speak for EVERY PERSON. (And this Psychic would have immediately to be put in Office, if not Upon the Throne, for he would draw his power from God and would be incorrigible so long as he is Powerful.  But this is simply archaic speculation.) The TRULY unpardonable Error, however, that any introverted troubleshooter would find in this particular line of code is this: that Democracy is somehow an END IN AND OF ITSELF. Six million Jews ostensibly die, but what makes their death a tragedy instead of a statistic, as Stalin would have put it? (mind you: Stalin was all so NOTORIOUSLY Extraverted; he even obligated his officers to play cards with him, under pain of Death.) The extravert does not, at least at this point, look at the Life of Every Individual Semite, Cripple and Romani, but rather at the sheer NUMBER of the deaths, which suggests that Society, which was supposed to provide the Greatest Good for the Greatest Number (Hitler’s Common Good) CLEARLY has failed, GIVEN THE STATISTICS. But why is this statistic not negligible, as it would be to Joseph Stalin? It is because we have a SCAPEGOAT: SOMEONE UPSET THE GODS. And it was Adolf Hitler, a lone German “psychopath” who SOMEHOW found the “bug” in Democracy. DEMOCRACY was our Lord and Saviour, but HITLER was the Anti-Christ who SOMEHOW MIRACULOUSLY turned the entire German Population into Jew-haters and LIED to them so he might KILL them. For what? Who knows. But he “slept like a baby”, knowing he had done What Was Right. And now WE know better…

This is of course a farce, but it is not exaggerated by any great margin. People blame Nietzsche, as well, an individualist and iconoclast who PRECEDES THE NAZIS. How do they manage to call NIETZSCHE a Nazi? Aside from Camus’ speculation on the topic, which was very soon after the War and prior to the Frenchman’s Untimely Death, (Long before he reached Socrates’ Age of Wisdom.) there is the desire to BLAME SOMEONE. Any one who knows any thing about German History knows that the Nazis were such insufferable parasites that they wanted to take total credit not ONLY for the works of Friedrich Nietzsche, but all so Hegel, Wagner, Goethe, and every great Genius who HAPPENED to be German. (To the Ignorant Exclusion of all Foreign Styles, even the Extreme Zen Sophistication of their Allies in the Far East.) Why was Nietzsche blamed? Aside from his ostensibly “Fascist” sister, who skewed his later works, apparently, in favour of the Reich, (if any man can find SENSE in the Modern Art Piece that is the Will to Power, much less an Ideology) there is the simple fact that Hitler Liked His Ideas, and Nietzsche died in 1900. He was the closest link, despite his notorious HATRED OF THE GERMAN HERD and LOVE FOR FOREIGN CULTURES (Most notably: the Greeks* and the East**).

*The Birth of Tragedy in the Spirit of Music.
**Thus Spoke Zarathustra.

Neither Nietzsche nor Hitler is reported as ever having personally killed anyone. In fact, Hitler was a Vegetarian. This has since become an Internet Meme to berate Vegetarians. But Vegetarianism is now and has all ways BEEN a private religious austerity. Any thing more done “in the name of” vegetarianism has been hypocritical. Had Hitler slaughtered six million people in the name of cows, he would have been a hypocrite. But he kept his private and his political life notoriously separate. To his credit.
The fact is: HITLER never SLAUGHTERED ANY one. HIS PEOPLE DID. All the damage that Adolf Hitler ever did he did as a MAN OF THE PEOPLE. Nietzsche PREDICTED the Third Reich under the growing THREAT of anti-semitism that was a problem on that entire Peninsula long before Hitler (or even Nietzsche) was borne. He did not PRESCRIBE it; he DESCRIBED it. And Hitler, in taking the Description as a Hopeful Omen, saw it as a chance to do what he most wanted: to Save Germany. And he EVEN took it a step further! He was not only Saving GERMANY. He was saving the German PEOPLE. And by so doing: the World.

Democracy fails not because someone triggers a latent “bug” in its otherwise PRISTINE programming. Democracy is not some sort of Achilles with a Heel. It is SMAUG with a MISSING SCALE.
Democracy does not HAVE a problem. It is not that we fail when DEMOCRACY DOES NOT SUCCEED. DEMOCRACY CANNOT succeed. Democracy is neither a noble end nor a humane means. It is BY ITS VERY NATURE Proto-Fascism. And Fascism is its only LOGICAL conclusion. A Holocaust Prisoner would know that just as well as would an officer of the Reich.

Ironically, of all intellectuals who could have SUMMED THIS UP before we had the OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE for it scientifically (from Jung to Kohlberg, up through contemporary psychiatric claims that people are “intrinsically racist, lazy and stupid”) was Friedrich Nietzsche:

"Vengeance will we use, and insult, against all who are not like us"—thus do the tarantula-hearts pledge themselves.
"And 'Will to Equality'—that itself shall henceforth be the name of virtue; and against all that hath power will we raise an outcry!"
Ye preachers of equality, the tyrant-frenzy of impotence crieth thus in you for "equality": your most secret tyrant-longings disguise themselves thus in virtue-words!

A Leader does not give the People What they Want. A Leader does not act out of what HE wants. And a Leader does not hide what HE wants under the guise of what The People Want, proudly. (Mind you: such leaders tend to be Extraverts. Hitler, the Vegetarian and Martyr of Germany, is customarily typed as an I.N.F.J, alongside Osama bin Laden and Gandhi.) A Leader does What is Right.
It is impossible to Be Right in a Group. Voting is pointless at best (as most cynics seem to believe) and dangerous at worst (as this relatively optimistic writer believes). The very notion of supporting an Appeal to the Populace is itself a Logical Fallacy. And Logic is no alien to Human Emotion. In FACT: the most Subtle and Evolved emotions can only be conveyed to lesser people via ABSTRACTION and REASONING. This comes with the territory for an Empath operating at the top of Kohlberg’s Moral Hierarchy. It may be unteachable (a word that for some suspicious political reason MicroSoft Word does  not recognize. But perhaps that only proves my point about unteachability.). Empaths understand the Universal Plane; SYMPATHY keeps us bound to the Lower Emotions of Greed, Lust, Malice, and the rest of the Sins, Deadly and otherwise Lethal.
If two wrongs do not make a Right, certainly do not a hundred of them, even if the People in the Right (your OTHER Right) are only a dozen. Any multiple of zero is still zero, as is any sum of zeros, and any Absolute Value. And any sum of negative numbers is still negative. Only by taking its Absolute Value can it be Positive, and that would require a total inversion of Right and Wrong. As for multiplication: the calculation would be reduced to Absurdity, for it would only be positive when there is an even number of numbers, and half the time it would be negative unless regularity were enforced. Zero cannot be the common denominator, and unfortunately any game of zero sum produces an Absolute Zero. And as it turns out: the common man is constantly in a Game of Zero Sum. Voting never works. It is, as was described by one philosopher, a “futile addition of zeroes”, motivated by “fear and laziness”. The premise of voting is at its very roots mob-rule. It is mediocrity. Why did we develop it? Because some thing in our early development saw an easy win. If every one is like me, theoretically, and there is a finite number of us, and we vote on every thing, then I will USUALLY win. The nature of a Majority should theoretically GUARANTEE that. If there are five of us, for instance, on an Island, THEORETICALLY each of us should win four out of five times, supposing only ONE man is outvoted each time. If it has to be TWO men that are outvoted, each of us would win three out of five times, and we’d still be MOSTLY happy MOST of the damn time*. But what happens when we vote on what to have for dinner? And since no one took CHARGE of how to gather Food, we have to vote for WHOM to eat for dinner. Now there are four of us. Supposing we vote then. Whereas before this there was a twenty percent chance of dying, now there is a twenty-FIVE percent chance! And then a THIRD! And then what? Well: you might imagine.

*Of course: an Empath, for instance, would never be Happy, except in a state of Unanimity, for love of the Minority.

We imagine the problem to be solved when there is a Larger Mass. But the problem only gets worse. The greater the group, the more oppressive the Potential Majority. On our Island, a man outvoted has to contend with only four other men. If, on the other hand, one were a Jew in Nazi Germany, or an African in Colonial North America, the odds would be by far more terrifying. And rest assured that to the same extent as you are oppressed when you are outvoted, the Man of the People rejoices. This is why even Benjamin Franklin defined democracy as “two wolves and a lamb trying to decide what’s for Dinner.”

I will never compromise my personal integrity for the Will of the People. The People, acting as One, are a Leviathan Beast composed only of self-interest and aggression. Only the Individual can be held responsible. Every inter-human conflict is between one man and an other man. Each man who sends an innocent man to the Gallows is personally responsible, but this guilt is hidden in the Crowd. There are no Decent Groups, and the measure of a Culture is in its Empowerment of the Individual. The conflict is never one of Man versus Group, except where a Mob operates, and may it be clear that this sort of Conflict I neither preclude by what follows nor condone (some, I know, will misread me as saying that there IS no mob but only the Individual can be Blamed for its shortcomings, and nothing could be a more egregious inversion of the values than that misreading). All conflicts are between Good and Evil, and only you can know, in SOLITUDE, what side you are on. Once you have chosen Goodness, Wisdom, and Selflessness, which does not preclude your own Rights to enjoyment of the same, every Vile Mob that promotes Evil, Ignorance, and Greed must be atomized into Individuals who have missed a step.
No one wins in a Democracy. The neat and even probabilities of the aforementioned Island are swiftly skewed in favour of an Oppressor and at the expense of the Oppressed. The Winner keeps on Winning, for only his popularity begins to matter, and he can ape any position and enjoy the recoil. The Truth is effaced, and the Empaths and Intellectuals are the first to be outvoted. This continues as the Mass grows stupid and weak without true Leadership. And all that participate suffer, if not from a loss of Life, then from a Loss of Character. Whatever World follows this one will punish those who, having learned to beat the System in their own favour, have floated, atop a pool of blood, froth, and sentiment, to the top.
Do not vote. Not because it’s pointless. But because it’s Wrong. Your True Voice has no Neighbour.


Dm.A.A.

THEATRICAL EXERCISE: MONOLOGUE.

This woman was surely psychotic. I mean: I can’t believe I even got off the PHONE with her, much less that I let her off the hook so easily. I must have been AFRAID to BLAME her. I mean, maybe it’s just that my parents never spoiled me like this, but what kind of Mother just PRESUMES that her own daughter is not some sort of sadistic, manipulative sociopath? Well, maybe I can’t speak from the same position of PRIVILEGE. But how do you call someone you do not even KNOW and tell him – WARMLY, at that – that there “never was a relationship”? What a bald-faced LIE. There WAS. There all ways IS. At all times. In all places. And the relationship HERE was totally PARASITIC. So what does she mean there never WAS one? THAT’S Kafkaesque. It’s like saying that every thing is not interconnected. But metaphysics aside, let’s look at the blatant facts: A relationship does not need to be romantic to be a relationship. And a romantic relationship does not require either the formalities nor the banalities in order to be Relevant. It can simply be expressed in Feelings. Feelings are Facts. As of the Twentieth Century at least, right? So how can she ACCUSE me of not only deluding MYSELF, but trying to do so to OTHERS as well? She has a DAUGHTER. She has a HUSBAND. And she tells ME – the innocent, twenty-six-year-old Virgin – that I SCARE people? Like I’m self-interested? Like *I’m* the one who’s self-entitled here? I’m sorry. I thought being SELF-ENTITLED has to come from a position of PRIVILEGE. “Wanting my share” is not Self-Entitlement; only the narcissists say that. You ever played BioShock? Read Rand? You get the idea, I’m sure. This is such bullshit. And besides: this girl was never CLEAR to me. This bitch of a Mother tells me that she “made it clear” that the friendship “was over” when she said she “wanted space”. First: NEEDED space seems like the proper translation. That was the IMPRESSION that I GOT, that I RECEIVED, that I WAS GIVEN. And besides that, honestly: you expect me to believe… well, let’s look at the term “space” first, in general. SPACE. That means: AMBIGUITY. When you give someone SPACE, there’s nothing fucking CLEAR about that. It’s the OPPOSITE! When you are WITH some one, you must be CLEAR. When you give someone SPACE, that’s saying: It’s UNCLEAR!! Right?? And you can’t be CLEAR when you break up with someone. There is nothing CLEAR about that. And was she CLEAR when she said that she never wanted to see me again? She WASN’T; she DIDN’T!! I mean how do these people EXPECT me just to KNOW. Just to INFER? Like: only a WEEK after she tells me that we’re going to be Friends Forever, and no matter what, and she does not “do awkward”, and I’m “all ways her People”, and I’m part of her “Soul Family”, only a WEEK goes by, all most five months after we MET, and now she tells me she needs SPACE and I’m supposed to TAKE THAT to mean that she NEVER WANTS TO SEE ME AGAIN? Only a delusional creep WOULD presume that! And you tell me that I was SUPPOSED to? Like I’m some delusional creep NOW because I DIDN’T? FUCK no. When you are WITH SOME ONE – in ANY sense, physical or emotional – you’re CLEAR. There is no CLARITY outside of that. There’s only the Jungle of Absurdity and Ambiguity. And you tell me to PRESUME the WORST about not only HER (whom you don’t blame one bit) but then MYSELF… and I am DOUBLY GUILTY for trying to NEGOTIATE here? No one DIED. It’s not DENIAL. It’s me wondering what the FUCK is going ON.
[Pause. Stop to smoke.]
And it’s not like she wasn’t hitting me up AFTER the fact any way. So she stood me up six times – seven, really. And that’s MY Fault for pressing on? Like she can LIE to me and cut me off completely and I’m supposed to PRESUME that she is LYING? You are CRAZY. This is NOT the straightforward, honest, JUST person I thought that I was getting to know. And honestly: you live with her. You should know better than to let her get AWAY with this bullshit. [He puffs.] I mean: [He coughs.] I mean… [He recovers.] I mean DAMN IT. Why is it OKAY for her to LIE to someone who was supposed to be an INDISPENSABLE FRIEND? HUH? I mean: [He tries the cigarette again, successfully.] I mean: A Restraining Order. Against Me. Christ. Who will you go to to TALK about this stuff now? Or did it never really matter to you? Was it all those theatre skills? Mixed with the psychoanalytic training, surely. And natural charisma. [He puffs again.] To think I was so docile. So loyal, like a dog. Despite ALL of my past experience with such people. Well: she SURELY meant for me to feel SECURE in the first phase of abuse. Not so much in the second one. It’s just so blatant. But how does the Mom Not See It? Probably she taught her it. [He puffs again.] Why LIE to me? Why be afraid? Of ACCOUNTABILITY? Of living up to your own WORD? You don’t put thoughts in my HEAD, BITCH. You just DON’T. Don’t come into my House, re-ARRANGE things, and just LEAVE like that. [He smokes again. He coughs, but with finality. And resolve.]


Dm.A.A.

Monday, December 4, 2017

PUBLIC LETTER to A.S.F.:

I hope that you are content to know that Alanna is dead, of suicide.
This is what happens when you do not listen to me, even when I know better than you do.
I have spent the better part of three years trying to prevent this, sabotaged at every corner by INSUBORDINATION from my INFERIORS.
You have been one of these inferiors.
I WARNED you about the assailants, and I alone was aware of their depraved condition. I expected that the very FACT that I was operating alone would have compelled you more urgently to come to my aid and to eliminate this menace. Instead, you not only insulted me by doubting me (when I knew myself all ready to be in the Right, and had stressed this fact). You ENDANGERED HER by disobeying me. Like the fetus that lived for some short and hopeful time inside your former girlfriend, Alanna died at your hands.
The assailant was an individual who had done direct harm to me by interrupting my correspondence with this woman. I am beyond the point that I might hold so petty a grudge that I would blame the Dead. I only regret that the blameworthy remain amidst the Living. Their remainder continues to be a threat to Life.
You did nothing to demonstrate your Loyalty to me against this breach of Loyalty on the assailant’s part.
You have behaved not as a Human Being would, but as a parasitic narcissist. The convictions of even a close friend who had come to your aid previously (when no one else would) were insufficient to you, even in the face of mortal danger. You had only to rely upon your own observations. Regrettably, they were informed not by altruism but by self-interest. This self-interest I cannot be blamed for, accused of, nor even SUSPECTED of. Not one of you can hold a candle up to me in terms of loyalty and other virtue. You have only yourselves to blame for Her Death.
When you finally found corroboration for me, you did not even bother to express remorse for not having listened to me sooner. This letter is to inform the World that I no longer regard you as a Human Being. In my Microcosm, which is in no way different from the Macrocosm, for it is informed by Reason, you are a parasite, and I reject that as having any part in the Human Condition. Burn in Hell, Saul. And do not expect me to come to your aid.


Dm.A.A.

THE MOON and ANTARCTICA:

ADDITIONAL NOTES: 

"The Moon and Antarctica" is the title of the first Major Label Album released by MODEST MOUSE. Modest Mouse is led by Isaac Brock, whose Sun Sign is in Cancer, the Crab. Cancer is ruled by the MOON in Western Astrology.

VOILA; le rêve:

You know what I noticed about human beings? We just can’t handle change. There is just so much campaign funding that goes into either denying that Global Warming is happening, or doing something to prevent or slow the process. But how much funding is actually going into building boats and floatation devices?

I had a dream that Stranger Things had more than two seasons. This puzzled my Dreaming Mind, which, after all, has become so intimately linked to my Waking Mind that it is privy to certain Conscious Facts, such as the number of Active Seasons for the show Stranger Things. But now that I come to think of it: it makes sense that in a Dream that so closely (yet with unforeseen Optimism) parallels a Paranoid Conspiracy that there would be untapped veins of Unseen Footage, which given the nature of Virtual Reality one might explore on the Fifth Dimension. So it was that I became a Ghost, haunting the chief protagonists of the show, which by this point had come to include (perhaps to the exclusion of the main cast) my new “friends” from San Marcos, such as Nicole Fitzgerald and her cult. My sister, an avid fan of Stranger Things, was most probably a part of this new line-up, and by breaking a no-longer-existent fourth wall (a paradox that only an avid reader would fathom: how can one break what isn’t there?) she managed to reassure me, time and again, that not only was this Season Real, but so was I. The premise for this Season I was stuck in seems to be “I am an Illusion”, a song by Rob Thomas that has been on my mind ever since I discovered the true nature of my Relationship with Nicole, I.A.L. I could not manage to get the attention of my main “go-to guy”, a figure only mysterious to the degree that one asks what his Formal Role is rather than his Television Stereotype, which has become sort of redundant in this Fifth Season of Breaking Bad that I am watching with my relative T.V.-illiterate Mother, I.A.L. (Relative, of course, only to myself and my Binge-watching sister.)
I had no hesitation, upon discovering my newfound power in order to HAUNT Nicole and her friends. It turns out that my visibility comes and goes depending on various factors, including my will, the time, the place, and my proximity to the viewer. Needless to say (though I would do well to remind myself): my Mother’s recent discovery, I.A.L, that I am near-sighted was the basis for this symbol, and it is not impossible that one of the things it symbolizes is the near-sightedness itself.
As it turns out: the group that I was harassing was a Band of Vikings, the very source of both Nietzschean vanity and its corollary proto-Fascism in the Herd. So as Yang peaked yin began to form. I followed my friends through the Tundra, until I had gone so far North that I had to turn around and start heading South. The further North I went, the higher my altitude as well. I know now why: yesterday, at Home Goods, a place my Mother frequents though I had not known this (and I’d not been there in seven years, the last time having been there with her) I saw a Globe whose Water Colour was Black. I thought, facetiously: this must be some sort of Politically Correct Globe, not unlike that pretentious map that has North facing Downward and South facing up. Why was the map so pretentious? Perusing the Globe I discovered the cause: There is A LOT MORE LAND in the Northern Hemisphere. A man sitting at his desk with the overhead lamp shining on his Globe would be hard-pressed to get a good view of Europe, North America, Asia, nor MOST of Africa. Only a South American, Australian, or Antarctican (is that even a Thing? MicroSoft Word says no, apparently.) would find a use for such a Globe, unless the light were shining FROM the DESK ITSELF and THROUGH the GLOBE, which would have to be translucent. Naturally, this would be damaging to one’s eyes over a long period of time.
A map that’s upside-down would be equally poor, considering that such maps that are meant to be hung in Classrooms tend to have the Upper Hemisphere at the average student’s eye-level, whereas the Lower One tends to level more with the torso.

The Dream was witty in reminding me that as one goes North one all so goes UP, for there is more refuge from Sea Level there. Tell THAT, please, to our young and eager Liberals: that their Maps do little to help us PREPARE for rising water levels. Our academic friends seem to have presumed that Global Warming will just be “fixed” before we have to worry about that, or, better yet! that there will be someone to blame for it, who might be used as a Floatation Device (Perhaps a “Corporate Fat Cat”?). It’s like they say in contemporary Buddhism, I guess: the Map is Not The Territory.

The Vikings found me. It was inevitable, and I was a Fool to cling to the Security (cough, cough; sorry, but it’s snowing) of my South Node, which had become not unlike the “Nodes” in Hoven Gorge from the third Ratchet and Clank game. Prior to my departure South I left a message in the snow (with my finger, of course) for My Guy, hinting very clearly (and in a fashion reminiscent of BioShock, both in terms of intent, style, and degree of hamming) that it was I that was the Ghost that Haunted Fitz and Co.
It was not long after I had returned to my little Synthetic Hobbit-Hole that Vikings stormed my paradise, blasting the song “Jumalten Kaupunki”, because apparently in this interactive Virtual Reality series the characters can hear the Soundtrack.
Naturally, one wonders this: if my South Node is in Cancer, but that is ALL so my Midheaven, what am I to do? How can I leave Home and then Find it Again? What’s further South, in other words, than South?
Appropriately enough (to still appear ironical in an age of Rampant Irony) it was my parents that showed me the way. I found my Mother and Father walking in the snow beside some sort of rounded blue, tusk-shaped Obelisk: a reminder of Nicole’s Ungoing* Imperial Presence, and a reference to her spiel about Egyptian Mystics. I had to apologize, by force of conversation, to my Mother for my occasional suicidally suggestive asides, and she did not hesitate to reprimand me, however fleetingly, for the perceived threats of self-harm. Yet I was surprised to learn this: that when I told her that I wanted to go down as far South as possible, she had not counted that as suicidal.

*I meant to say “Ongoing”, but this typo amuses me.
My parents arranged for me to Take a Little Trip in my Low Rider down to the South Pole. My Father insisted, in that same conversation outside the Blue Horn, that it was not Cold Down There at all. Much as tends to be the case where Astrology is concerned I.A.L, I ignored what I was sure to have been some nonsense about the Earth’s Spin, settling for the less embarrassing conviction that my Scientific Knowledge (which I had come to regard as Mere Fact) had at some point been a relevant theory. This, of course, proves that my Dream was set in the Future, though when I arrived on my Surfboat* I found myself in Rapture. Even the quality of the water evoked BioShock, a dystopia set in the past. The sky evoked Courage the Cowardly Dog, most notably the episode where Courage and Muriel escape from Katz Island, and most particularly the SCENE when they have successfully done so aboard a Cruise Vessel. Somehow: the Dream suggests that my Dystopian Past is behind me, and my Utopian Future looms ahead. My Father had made it clear to me in that same conversation outside Blue Horn that the only truly COLD places are now the Mountain Peaks. Perhaps my Goat-like pursuit of Worldly Success (a reference blatantly to my Capricorn North Node, as well as my Fourth House) will only end me up where I began? If so, I look forward to a Warm New Beginning. Maybe I’ll even get LAID, for once!! Hahaha.


*How does Word recognize this word?

Dm.A.A.