Tuesday, July 10, 2018

The Dignity of Victimhood: (et cetera.)


When people are unified in opinion as though it were some fact, I tend to presume that any opposing view is fact, should I find reason to oppose it.



Dm.A.A.



Any thing of colossal significance will not be confined to only one solution.



Dm.A.A.



People do not want to be Happy; they want to be Right.



Dm.A.A.



That I was born not into some Paradise but a terrible trap where I must fend for survival as all die around me: that I can stand. What I cannot stand is to be a direct contributor to the wreckage. At that point, I would sooner renounce the problems of the World than to entertain the vanity of a solution. I would help only by chance or as a pastime, waiting to succumb. I’d put the problems of the World behind me and put Reality Itself before me, for it would become a Game of Radiant Imminence rather than a constant strife for power. I would no longer sacrifice individuals in service to a projected mass. I would be blameless, living that life that I would have lived in better times, or at least its closest approximation, thanking God each day for favouring me and doing my best to honour those two promises I made to my best teachers: to be happy, and if I must suffer, to do so with dignity. The problems trouble me. But I will not be preached to as though I have not dwelt on them every day. I will simply find Joy Inside Myself, for the only Peace of the Heart available is that which is won not over time in constant battle for a better future, but rather NOW, since Virtue is its own Reward. I dare not become what I have all ways opposed.



Dm.A.A.

Friday, July 6, 2018

How to Build a Ghost:


In the Past, War was an easy Business. You simply planted something incriminating on whatever country that you wanted to invade, and then you went to war with them. It was not hard to get people to hate their neighbours if the neighbours looked strange and exotic. The tribal mind has a neat little attribute that it can skew the rational mind in its own favour. We are not WIRED to “like Others”; we are wired to like ourselves, except for those few who’ve developed their civilized minds.

Thankfully, civilization lets everyone join the club, ESPECIALLY in egalitarian (American) society. You don’t have to ACT civilized to FEEL civilized; you can be a total bitch, and no one can tell you not to be. Matter of fact, neither can YOU tell them NOT to tell you to stop being a bitch. And it’s that mutual enmity, that totalizing passive aggression that loves to judge but does not let itself be judged, that is just how you know the System Works. It’s what we all want!! To be infallible, but to appeal to human-all-too-human error when the ruse is too expensive to perpetuate.

There never was a racist person. There were only stupid people: people whose opinions could systematically be molded by their governments. You think that those Koreans who protest “modern art” were forced to do so? Maybe. But you can damn well bet that they believe in it. You know why? HERD IMMUNITY. The Herd Mentality. The Human Animal wants not just to be Right, but to be Popular. So you appeal just to the Tribal Mind in People. That’s where all the fun stuff happens. Us and Them. The Tribal Mind sees Other as a Threat to Us. And although it’s constantly the enemy of Rationality and Civil Rights, it can be PERSUADED that it lays a claim to Those Great Virtues of the Reasonable Animal. WE are now the “civilized” society, and THEY’RE the brutes.

The irony is sweet, a sweetness in proportion to the fact that it is lost upon these people who partake in it. And when I say “these” people, I do not mean THOSE people. THOSE people, in the Distance, whom we have to bomb because they’re animals (why not put them inside a Zoo instead?!) know very well that WE’RE Insane. But that is just the thing: they do not have the strength of arms to prove that point. And arms are all one needs. Call it just what you like: Patriotism or Fascism. We can skew the ethics in our favour. If people start to Wake Up to the fact that we’re not enemies but FRIENDS, you call the Scientists. They’ll dig up fossils that will prove that Friendship is Genetically Impossible. If that falls through, you call the Media. Show the World JUST how much we NEED to be there, not for our own sake, but rather for THEIR sake and for the Sake of Civilized Society. If that won’t do it, win the Liberals. They don’t like “racism”, right? They still think that it exists, because they’re part of it; every attempt they make to put a stop to it is just what we need: tribal people donning civilized masks and condemning those whose primitivity is bald-faced. If the enemy is “racism” rather than Ignorance, who will attack the GOVERNMENT? Wherever THAT shot comes from, it will NOT be from the Left. It won’t be from the Right only because the Right does not want to evolve; that’s what “conservatism” means. A lot of them do not BELIEVE in Evolution at all!!

But now we have a new snag to worry about. The Internet is powerful. If I can snapchat with some woman in the Middle East who just lost her one son to a Drone Strike, perhaps I question the Nobility of War. How do you sell THAT loss? I COULD tell you that we were there for her own good, but if our drones destroyed her life then we’re no better than her “patriarchal” husband. And we can hardly BLAME her just for BEING there. So nationalism has its limits. We can bully weaker nations all we want, but nothing will stop them from rising up against us, with help from within our own borders, UNLESS we can somehow SELL Nationalism TO those nations. And then what? Well: it’s not hard to do if they can be persuaded that not only do we have THEIR interests at heart, but that their neighbours DON’T.

So we have this situation: we can no longer just PICK a nation and suck it dry by calling its people names. And whatever we do, we absolutely MUST make sure that nations, just like citizens within our nation, prize their own autonomy even as they all work to sponsor US, for their protection. A skilled propagandist knows EXACTLY how to pull this off; he’s lived his life just DREAMING of the Day that he can prove it. You invent an enemy that HAS NO NATIONAL AFFILIATION, but that can BEHAVE JUST LIKE A NATION. Here’s how the fiction works: its People are all, By Their Very Definition, Terrorists and Savages; otherwise they are not part of the club. Next: they are collectively as STRONG as any Nation, so an Other to be Reckoned With. But there’s no way to Measure just how strong they are, since no one knows who is in charge. Finally, they are spread out all over the World. So any nation that we see FIT to attack we do so, just as always, only this time we’re not KILLING all those people; we are SAVING them, and they are BEGGING for our crusade of salvation.

Don’t you see the very GENIUS of it now?!? Think about it: in the PAST, you couldn’t wage war on a COUNTRY with an easy stomach. Liberals would tear you down at  every turn for doing GENOCIDE, that last great vestige of tradition. One civilian casualty in Germany or Iraq, and we are to the pious mind all scum and murderers. But if The Enemy HAS no civilians, because its legion is entirely composed of Thieves: well, that’s MYTHOLOGY. THAT is the long-awaited Holy WAR!! All of our longings for heroism are contained within that fantasy, for it is coded into our very BONES. You can make a movie about war that preaches pacifism, and yet will not disrupt hegemony; people will simply be less LIKELY to defy the GOVERNMENT on Their Own Terms.

In the PAST, men followed their Own Hearts. Some of them beat in unison with a patriotic drum, whereas others found their Calling conscientiously off of the battlefield. Some fought, others loved. The lovers gave up war to seek the hearts of Women, and those women wanted nothing more than to find a man WORTHY, tender and sentimental, hence a GENTLEMAN. Gentleness has no place in our business.

In the PAST, women would light the way for Men to Find Themselves; their very sensitivity encouraged civilized man to EMBRACE his Anima – his Interminable Spirit. The whole QUEST was one of finding Love akin to the Mother’s Breast.

But no more!! It’s hilarious, if you will think about it.

We destroyed the Damsel in Distress; she doesn’t need saving. We sent all of our women out on an eternal errand. Great!! More people in the military, fewer in the nursery. More people in the office building means fewer at home. More people to enforce Our Laws, even if it DISSOLVES the Family. No one is around to teach a new generation of boys and girls how to THINK, so they resort to Television and that very Internet that we now have made Our Own. Morality is relative in That World of Virtual Reality, since actions have no worldly consequences. One man’s dystopia is an other man’s PARADISE. And why not, right? Who am I to judge? Just some filthy stinking rich white MALE. That’s all they see me as, regardless who they are. And I made sure of it, for BOTH our sakes: yours and mine, so YOU don’t get any ideas.

THIS is how we created our contemporary Enemy. There is a saying in Taoism: solve small problems before they can turn to big ones. If the Enemy is a Ghost, no one can kill it. It must possess a body. Tell me now: how many people must I BOMB before some Radical takes arms against me? One hundred? Two thousand? Because you KNOW that we have the technology, as WELL as the Incentive and Consent.

Yes: given pause you may be so inclined to rationalize. Why, for instance, would we allow Civilian Casualties at ANY rate, ESPECIALLY if we’re not TARGETTING a Nation but a Group?

Ahh, but when those Radicals fight BACK, possessed of ZEAL to match our own, inspired by their one last hope – GOD ALMIGHTY – then we don’t think; we act. It’s how we’ve all been raised. The boss isn’t all ways right, for he’s not God, but we’re not “radicals” who will believe in Him. Nay!! We are RATIONALS that can move PAST him. Yes: we DO have the technology.

You see? The boss is not infallible, but he is still the Boss. And that’s us!! WE say “go to War”, and THEY will do it. WE say “send the Drone”, the Bomb, the hateful text, and They Will DO IT.

Now you see, right? Who is stronger than US? And by what criteria are we NOT justified? By God? God is a suit that we put on when we succeed and just a jacket we put on for when we fail; He’s not an Ethic, because those who USE Him as an Ethic are the ENEMY.

So we created that same Enemy. It’s like I said to you beforehand: those Koreans who protested modern art did so wholeheartedly. So do the radicals who march under the banner WE created for them. They want what all tribal people want who have no use for Reason in a hostile world: Solidarity. They don’t hate freedom; it’s just at this point to be found only in a suicide bombing. We love that when we see it in movies because WE’RE the Good Guys, all ways. It’s just how we’re wired, am I right? We all want to be Heroes. But if men and women cannot save each other, for they’re forced into some brutal competition for the Emperor’s Amusement, what choice do they have but to assimilate, donning the helm and shield of valor, minus that sword of discretion that will give them any fighting chance!?!

HAHAHAHA.

This is Our World, my friend, entirely for Our Amusement. If a man can’t save a woman, at least he can save the World and win that woman’s favour. If he has to be a fighter to match hearts with Mother Mayhem, for she is no longer dainty Damsel in Distress, then there is no longer any lover who is not a fighter, and all fights are those WE supervise. You want the proof? See how the media depicts the martyrs who kill our precious colosseum fodder. They only give the tribal mind reason to FEAR True Individuality, and by so doing to disown True Reason. I don’t think that guy who shot up country music fans in Las Vegas was crazy. He was just a gambler. But I’m not going to tell THEM that; they wouldn’t even listen to me. Bless their Souls.

No one knows when next the Ghost will strike. If it is omnipresent as the Devil, it can come from anywhere. No foreigner is safe, so Nationalism thrives under our Totalizing Supervision. You train people to ACCEPT this, and they will rationalize it with the entire FORCE of Reason. It takes an EXTREMELY subtle mind to recognize it for insanity. And he is most often, as you’ve figured out by now, my friend, deemed Insane.



Dm.A.A.

Wednesday, July 4, 2018

For the Moth:


If you had to struggle with being Psychic, you would know better than to rely upon Reason alone. The God of Reason is not the final God of Paradox, and it is inhumane to forego the latter for the former. Not only is it superficial and in fact superstitious. By shutting out all of the psychic data that you take from your environment, presuming it to be internal rather than external (secondary versus primary) you allow the conscious psyche to be bypast by that same data, so that you will act on subliminal suggestion and propaganda by presuming (as people have been proven to, under the influence of various forms of mind control, both clinical and cataclysmic) that the thoughts of others are your own. If empathic, you will confuse the aggression and excitement of a crowd for your own, assigning personal reasons to it when in fact you had no personal emotional investment in the matter, at Heart. You will absorb all that goes on around you energetically and then behave as though you had produced it, either pawning off others’ theories as your own or becoming a fanatic in service to the common will. Your judgment, precious though it might be to you, will thus all ways be skewed in favour of the lowest common denominator. Any notion of your own which has yet to be proven will require proof upon your part before an impersonal (and projected) audience, so that you will stumble through life with a sort of awkward grace and logic. Devoid of faith, you will allow sheer fact to govern your life, so that you will cling to half-baked theories until they no longer satisfy you, discarding the dough entirely when you are disappointed, for where further consideration would have let you bake the theories to completion, with respect for the fact that the matter will abound in contradiction, one-sided barbarism in attempts to win the public favour (at worst: successfully) will doom you to nihilistic despair, for whatever Truth your own Body produces will not matter once “disproven” to be “anecdotal”. But an anecdote is only so when it is told aloud. In this sense, “being baked” to perfection can reward you with heights greater than a high, and I would advise against putting your “weedy twenties” behind you. It is a mark of typically collegiate immaturity to taper your personality to a point, repressing parts of you until only a solitary line of thought is left. It’s every bit a form of reductionistic mental suicide as dropping too much acid. And it leads to PRECISELY the same dead ends. God bless you. R.G. P.S.: I wrote you a poem that I should share with you. There were some letters as well, in response to some of your Spring posts, but those can wait I suppose. Have you seen the Moon and Mars of late? They’re as bright as you are, if not brighter. That’s because of the Cancer Decans. It works!! https://allpoetry.com/poem/13970099--If-only-for-one-moment-you-could-open-your-Third-Eye---by-spontation51
Dm.A.A.

DECOMPOSITION:


When I write a composition, code, or play, my love for it is in direct proportion to my perfectionism. Every tone must be a celebration of itself as well as its neighbours; no part of it must reflect my own involvement in it, though it will invariably retain my character. Every decision implies a set of responsibilities that follow; I am not in control, but rather it is being written and I have to be allegiant to it. I can master very little, except in direct proportion to my receptivity to the Ultimate Goal. That Ultimate Goal is not my Goal, but rather the goal of the work itself: its teleological destination, towards which I move with every gesture. It appears, at first, arbitrary, but it becomes at the end the culmination of purposive forces.

People are much the same way, as are my dealings with them. Great care and tact must be taken to tune each one to perfection, compelling them to sing those notes that they must sing so that there might be Harmony within the Divine Auditorium. They must be debugged, refined, and made presentable before the Divine Audience, for otherwise their lives would be discord. The state of my personal microcosm is no different from the state of the World. Insofar as they are themselves dreamers and composers, I must attend their Visions just as well, becoming compliant with their tunings and their writings. However, insofar as I am the composer and the lot of them are only voices, I expect this same compliance in return. We cannot write songs for angels if we are ourselves mere imps.

Is it surprising now that the boy who paid no heed to overtones himself refused subordination with some sort of narcissistic indignation? What right did he have to claim autonomy, as though his actions were merely “his” and that no one could know better than he could how to behave? What right does the solitary string have to defy its neighbours and the One Who Strums? Is it any more surprising that the boy who all ways broke his strings and mine, as well as my keys and the very locks they served, (those precious platinum blonde strings) himself refused to be tuned? Is it surprising that his melodramatic opera fizzled into noise and faded into worldly silence? Mine was no ulterior agenda, but rather the solitary birthright that such deviants have forever denied me: Harmony on Earth and preparation for Heaven. It was rather the noisemakers and rascals that served deviant purposes that could only abuse the sacred instruments we were endowed with and leave the body of the guitarist hollow.

My own head now looks like the head of that guitar, with its deviant wires protruding at odd angles. I was all ways terrified of playing it, for fear of probably becoming it. But then I heard my sister strumming it one day, having stolen it in good humour from my bedroom. I know that it’s good enough. For if Life cannot be Life without some fair share of noise, then I will bear the image of the screaming deviant even as I operate in secret to serve the Composer’s Will. Nothing has changed, except in overtones. My bass remains the same. My face remains the same. If I should find a new Spirit to answer to, at once precise and deviant, abounding in accidentals and misspellings, then this bug shall be a feature. I was not initially this way; I excelled in the classics. I was made this way by my conditions, and I would be lying not to tell the story. Your negligence of overtones becomes my passage into the Unknown, for now that I have mastered what has become marginal I can turn that same mastery towards my own ends, without defying the Will that even let this virtue fall into irrelevance.



Dm.A.A.

Tuesday, July 3, 2018

RULES.


RULES:

1.       Match the word to the deed, and match both to your Heart.

2.     All ways present yourself as you Truly Are.

3.      Do not change for anyone; remember that the Villains of the World were simply those who lost Themselves.

4.     If you cannot accept Reality, change it.

5.     If you cannot change Reality, make your own.

R.G.


Sunday, July 1, 2018

In the Right Light:


THE VISION:



Suppose, for just one moment, that there is a beam of light within my Mother’s bedroom. And my mother sits and types at her computer. And I’m sitting in the corner, right between two rather massive cabinets full of clothes, upon a tiny footstool that I’ve known since I was very young. And the light: it shines upon me. Mother does not see it, because she is busy; only someone sitting where I’m sitting at this moment truly Knows the Light. If she looked up, then she might see my face illuminated. But she would not know from whence the light came. If she has either humility or common sense she might infer that somewhere in this room there is an aperture through which the Sun is shining, and that any one who sits where I am sitting at this moment SEES it. She might even ask for me to move that she might see it. I might choose, though, to stay seated, for the Light might change, and if it changes I don’t want to miss it. It’s not that I am so special, for having seen it first, that I alone deserve to see the Light and thus to see it change. But if I were to move and in the time it took for her to take a seat it were to change, she might see something that’s entirely different from what I saw. Perhaps I saw a golden light, but she perceived a green light. Maybe I know that it has turned green because now her own face is coloured green, though I can’t know for sure, since it is not impossible that my own face might have been coloured green by golden light; colour is still a mystery to me.

She might dismiss the matter altogether, if she lacks humility and common sense, by pretending that the glow came just from me. But even a scientifically inquisitive mind, bent on firsthand experience, might find it hard to be objective. We might produce entirely different inferences about the Nature of the Cause, even if we both perceive the Cause Itself. A more dogmatic mother would presume that I’m the cause, that I am glowing of my own accord, and that I don’t REFLECT a Light that came from Heaven (so to speak). In that case, only I would see the Light For What It Is, as demonstrated by the nature of the hole in the ceiling. But even if both of us were to pursue the light by paying close attention to its Source, we might disagree about its Nature. Mother then might deny my account entirely, or she might choose to forget ever having SEEN the Light, so that I would not compel her testimony to corroborate my own. All things considered, however, this would be a disservice on her part, and I would not allow myself to repeat it. I could not stop her from defaming my account or from denying memory of the event, but at the very least I might maintain that I Know What I Know. So long as I am compassionate to those who DON’T know, all is well, and someday I might share with them My Vision.

Now: suppose that Light were God’s Own Truth. Suppose it’s like the pink light from Philip K. Dick’s books, or perhaps even the light that sailors saw at sea. Obviously, simply SEEING it would all ready have been a plus, perhaps of infinitely surpassing value. And even if I might never be able to express God’s Truth to those around me, at the very least I might live in accordance with it, pardoning them for mishearing me each time their ears were seduced by the Devil.



Not every image is a mirror. Our society suffers from such an excess of extraversion that we’ve forgotten to think in Images. We still DO think in images, but we’ve come to rely upon words. Hence I am confined to words in the expression of my Inner Eye. And if my words seem laughable, it only serves as testament to how misleading words can be once they’ve become clichés.

The words themselves are powerful, but much of their meaning is now gone. Words have been made into idioms, and idioms are assigned to images. The images we have now are of people, and our attitude towards people is dualistic. A person who uses a given political idiom, even if only by chance, is affiliated by the Tribal Mind with a political party, usually one of two, or several sets of two. To use a single set of words might render one’s identity within the pack: in-group or out-group, liberal or conservative, black or white, radical or moderate, ignorant or informed. Sometimes, the prejudices of any one observer might all ready have assigned a great deal of these arbitrary projections to the speaker, so much so that if the speaker were to say one word that is forbidden for him to say then he is considered a threat not only to those who are ALLOWED to say it (usually with their own twist, as one has come to expect) but all so to all of CIILIZED society.

I like Civilized Society. It’s a neat concept. But it’s not to be confused, as these people do, with the status quo. Rather, the entire preservation of the Civilizing Instinct, as well as its consummation in the Utopian Vision of a Truly Civilized Human Being, is every reason to defy the status quo.

I’m sure you follow what I mean so far. But if not, do read on at any rate. And rest assured I know that this attempt to level with you is no more than an aesthetic conceit, as most leveling is.

The truth is that most people I’ve encountered do not think as I do – that is, rationally. When they are COMPELLED to think as I do, they’re afraid to be made to “conform to someone else’s will”. Sometimes, if I can keep my distance, then they are impressed with me. But they are nonetheless intimidated, and somehow it does not bother them to leave me all alone with my convictions.

Can you blame me for my condescension then? People have yet to prove me wrong, and I have yet to find that sort of solidarity I seek that could make me feel I am in the company of Equals.

Every moment I stand in the Light I see things fed to me From Up Above that seem like madness if translated into language. I see things in Images, as all Visionaries do, imminently. I’ve told you: not all images are mirrors. Often when the individual finds fault with people it is by avenue of Projection. The Evil is within one’s self, in those cases, to a degree no less (and often more) than it is in the Other. My Father suffers from such projections; I have been their target often. I have no reason to say, therefore, that I project upon my Father. What I see in him that’s troubling is simply evidenced by my experience. Experience is cheap, but it’s effective in resolving fleeting moments of discord.

It would seem arrogant, again, to say that when I hear him speak of matters callously I know WHY he is wrong about them. To the narcissistic critic (who’s dismissed all ready ALL of my own Life Experience) it appears that I begin here by presuming upon my own righteousness, inferring from it the integrity of my position, and seeking reasons to explain why others do not hold the same position, finding fault with them without allowing them to find fault with me, or perhaps escaping criticism by keeping it a secret from them, priding myself in my tact, so that should I be met with criticism BY them I might call them the aggressors whilst I simply keep my peace.

I’m not so passive-aggressive, as it would turn out. Plenty of times I’ve had to tell people off, hoping I would help them to resolve a matter that they all ready had set out to resolve. And just as many times I’ve been dismissed. If you cannot hold a civil conversation with someone, you must conclude that you are Right. That must be Enlightenment: to be a Light unto one’s Self and Others. Leastwise, it’s to reflect it where one finds It.

Dm.A.A.

THE SAINT’S ELITISM:


THE SAINT’S ELITISM:



I recently went out bowling with my parents. My sister stayed home; it was late. I won both rounds, but some troubling thoughts haunted me throughout the evening. Although I’d done my best not to allow myself to be triggered by narcissistic manipulation, I could not help but to feel such overwhelming pity for these Satanic souls that I had to maintain an internal dialogue with them. What I said I was not proud of; no one ever wants to have such a conversation, so it’s not something one derives great joy from. It’s rather a chore.

The manner of my life has been neither easy nor conventional. From an extremely young age, I was set apart for my intelligence and my good will. I excelled not only in creative activities and academics (though I was a bit slow and all ways idiosyncratic). I all so endeared myself to elders and betters because of my natural charm and kindness. Not all kids were as innocent as I was. And when teachers spoke of excellence it was not uncommon for them to speak of me. This is simply the truth. I have no ulterior motive to present it; it is all I’ve ever known. Though it DOES lead into what I have next to say.

The joys of recognition all ways fought against the pains of being needed. Not only did I have constantly to impress my parents and teachers. I all so felt a deep sense of empathy and pain for those I’d deemed less fortunate than I was. Only in passing was I told I HAD to pity them; most often I could simply feel it when I met them. And I saw the World as being at once beautiful and terrifying.

When my peers speak now to me of “childhood naivete”, I know what they’re referring to only as it applies to them. When I hear “innocence”, I don’t think of naivete. I think of blamelessness. And I had sworn that that would never change for me. At the age of twenty-seven, it has yet to. I learned from a young age that what is popular is seldom if ever right and usually it is absolutely arbitrary. So it followed that to be arbitrary was an evil and to be purposive was a Good. And nothing could part me from my fortitude.

When someone disagrees with me, that does not bother me. I simply figure out WHY that person is wrong; I do not change my own position. When my Father says something stupid, I take note of his shortcomings, which have all ways skewed his perspectives. I see how his opinions say something of himself. I do not let him make me think that MY opinions say something of MY self. I have no reason to take personal responsibility for his shortcomings; I have simply to acknowledge them internally, externalizing the position only if it proves to be a problem. Any shortcomings of my own are just that: my own. If they mattered, I would know ABOUT them long before an other did. And I all ways would know if they matter. Morality was never relative to the observer, so a conflict of opinion does not reveal two sets of prejudices that are just respective to the warring parties; rather it reveals a set of prejudices on the part of the erring party. I am not alone in this conviction. Soren Kierkegaard, considered the most profound thinker of the nineteenth century (by Wittgenstein, who is considered the most profound thinker of the TWENTIETH century) wrote an entire book dismissing the Leveling process. He was himself not alone in dismissing the Ideal of Equality; Friedrich Nietzsche all so spoke ill of it. Put simply: one must never let the desire for Solidarity and Belonging to take precedence over one’s personal development; one must have fortitude enough to get up on that high horse, day in and day out, over and over again, cultivating objectivity through self-knowledge and tempering conviction with gentleness. The High Horse is a right because the Higher Ground is a responsibility. It is no fault of mine if others fall short of it, nor must I avail myself of what their reasons are; I have simply to note the failure and its most probable causes, that I might learn from their mistake before it might become my own. It’s all ways been that way. I cannot say I ever was a Happy child. But at least I was Right. Alasdair MacIntyre seals the deal. He writes that morality has become corrupted by emotivism. From an emotivist perspective, every conflict requires both parties to share the blame, for each position in that conflict is motivated only by personal emotive drives. In fact, however, ethics is not a horizontal plane that can be made prey to extortion and other forms of devious quid pro quo; it is a vertical plane, with how we are upon the bottom and how we Should Be upon the Top. The Reverend Martin Luther King Junior understood this, though our elementary schools never taught it. King was an intellectual; he understood that to be Equal we must WORK for it. Only the most basic needs are given by Nature, and even for those needs to be MET an exceptional moral effort is to be made on the parts of all people, both those who have and those who have not. In this sense, he came to the same conclusion as MacIntyre, who spoke of Virtue and Excellence as its own reward: King was a Communist. And it does not require either holiness or genius to see this common sense: that any Community that does not embrace Community as an Ideal is overrun with vice. At that point, history repeats itself, only because the Few and Proud will stand out. For myself, I can say this much: being one of the few, a virgin at the age of twenty-seven, as well as an introvert, no longer bothers me. I’m proud of my position. I was raised for it. It’s all I ever knew. And it was what I gave my childhood up for. I don’t like to be Right All the Time.



I’d rather that each person I could teach would learn,

and that he’d teach me in return.

I’d rather that he never spurn me but would reach

out to me as I yearn.

I’d rather live and easily forgive

when I am able to reform. And insofar as I am stable

in this fable I can thus inform.

That if I’m stable I am able and this will become the norm.

But if I cannot reach them to beseech them I can keep my own heart warm.

For if he will not listen then I have nothing to learn from him.

Yet if I should dismiss him I will not dismiss him on a whim.



It’s really as simple as being sober in the midst of drunkards. I can nod along and learn a lot about them, but if they say something that is totally ridiculous then I can say, without the slightest impulse to contrive, that they are drunk, and that is all. Being Right is too precious of a treasure to be wasted on those who don’t value it, and anyone who would take it from me on principle can have no principles; no moral agent actually sees morality as though it were subjective and relative. It is not arrogance that nurtures my conviction, but humility and drive. Humility is not dependent on one’s fellows; they can come and go, but character remains. With true humility comes that one gift: Self-Knowledge. Most people don’t have it, and I don’t think I can change that all together. What I can say for a fact is this: that if I know myself, and if myself and Other are akin, then I know the Other. If I have empathy for Others in my Heart, I see where their own emotions reach a narcissistic dead end. I do not require sympathy for them, but rather only caution in their midst, and any problems that arise I know will be their fault. I do not suffer from my own shortcomings; I amend them. What my enemies preclude is that their OWN shortcomings would cause suffering for me. And by precluding this they evidence their own depravity of character. That I would blame them constantly would not reflect upon my own, for I do not project evil upon the World. It’s simply THERE, objectively, in Human Strife. And I’ve chosen to never be a part of it. If this was simply our common duty, how could I be wrong?

After the Bowling Alley we stopped by Jack in the Box to get some curly fries. I’d barely eaten this entire week, and I’m still looking for a job. As we walked in it took me no time to remember my first job, for I would go to this same restaurant quite often during my lunch shift. I was comforted by the memory of who I was back then. Though I felt like a sell-out, I then saw no reason not to make the most of working at a fabric store. I believed in Human Goodness as a Unifying Cause, ubiquitous throughout religions and evidenced by all the arts. I expected adulthood to be a break from all the pains of childhood; children have to work hard to get to this point, but adults can have fun and do whatever they want. I was treated otherwise. Despite all my attempts to Level and Connect with my comrades at Joann Fabrics, I was treated with disdain and judgment. I did nothing to change their opinion of me, since I was never in the habit of adapting myself to my neighbours; I just sought the company of better neighbours. If every individual was precious, I would do a disservice to my own individuality by changing; I could only hope to change their impression OF me, and if they refused to change that then at least I’d know I’d done my best to teach them by example.

Back then, I believed that all the World were Good. I knew myself to be Good; I’d been Good since I was five years old, and I was loved even before that. So I wanted to believe that the whole World was Good like me. Apparently, this was not so. But for the first time in my life I had this troubling thought: that they did not WANT to be Good Like Me. That they would rather be Bad in Their Own Way than to follow my example. And I did not dare to conclude this. Too much depended on my authority. I had a younger sister who had to be saved from any corrupting influence. I had a dog to take care of. I had dreams to make real. This was not the time for a crisis of faith.

When I first walked into that Jack in the Box, I trusted people. Now I don’t. But only because I learned this: that people are not Equal. They could be, but they choose not to be. And That’s Fine. If someone errs, he does not redefine propriety to suit his error. He simply falls short of virtue. And that’s okay. Most often, it is just a passing observation in my mind. I do not need to verbalize it unless it becomes a problem. But there is a gang of ingrates who will make an accusation even when I keep my peace, thus making problems out of petty failings. They have nothing to condemn me for, so they condemn me for the one thing that they can find worthy of condemning: that I am right all the time. But since this is the exact OPPOSITE of vice, and rather the Ideal, how can I shake before the accusation, except that I seem to be in the company of lunatics whose tone of voice suggests that virtue itself is their enemy?

All ways I’ve excelled in virtue. I eat little. I read much. Most of the work I do I expect nothing in return for; most of the money that I earn goes to either my friends or my investments, if not just to feed me so my parents do not all ways have to. I do not suffer from narcissism, because I do not allow my values to be skewed by personal self-interest; I simply observe objective ones, and I can defend them till the Death by the full force of cultural tradition. I don’t worry about my condition; I don’t obsess over my own appearance. I am humble; hence I can speak plainly on such matters without the need for distortion. Even when I started my first job I had all ready suffered slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. I forgave the people who had wronged me for their arrogance. But I would not make the mistake of trusting them again should they say I was crazy. My entire life I have had one true task: To Be Right. When I succeeded, it was just expected; when I failed, it was unbearable. I had to hold the family together. I have yet to DO a single thing I “want” to, though I try each day to align my desires with my duties. I’m not Happy. But being Happy was not the Goal. No one wants to be happy; people want rather to suffer for a Common Good; otherwise they are not people. When I had my first true breakdown in college, I trusted people so much that for some time I forgot just Who I Was. I’d let my better judgment be bypassed by hostile agents. Now I do not let them get to me, except when I must learn from their own errors. I was never crazy; the same symptoms of “insanity” in me were simply consequences of the virtue I had spent my youth perfecting. I had won; I was not perfect, but I had attained perfection. I had found the Truth, the Beauty, and the Good. My Life had value, and no one would ever make it forfeit. I had grown up, ready to join the ranks of saints and sages who had gone before me. And I accepted humbly.

People all ways came to me for guidance. Most of them abandoned me when they did not want my advice. I could never come to them, and that’s all right. As surely as I mount the High Horse now, observing them from up on high with gentleness, rather than fighting them upon the ground, as they are prone to, I know that I do this out of love and service to them. It is a double standard, and it’s in their favour; It’s all ways been so. So they can come to me for help and offer nothing in return. My parents are not so, but only because I had had to teach them, for a second time, to be Good Parents; that’s not my responsibility, for I am still a virgin, but I did not mind it that I had to be the one to tell them. After all: if my life is not forfeit, but retains the same surpassing value that it had in childhood, why should I expect anything less? I cannot render it worthless by selling it to some corrupt organization. And for once it’s all in harmony. How could I let the parasites corrupt it?

People still come to me for guidance. Only some days ago I received a call from a girl who was suicidal. She was not trying to save me from despair, nor did she want me to save her. She just wanted to drag me down with her. I do not know why people do these things. But I will not be an excuse for her. She could not prove a single thing that I’d done wrong. She did not even presume I had. She simply condemned me that I’d done what was expected of me: Every Thing Right. The classes that I failed I failed because I knew the teachers were misguided. No one doubted my intelligence when I was young, and they don’t doubt it now. And when Aldous Huxley said that intelligence and good will were the two essential and indispensable virtues, he did not include Equality in his assessment. That says something. Austerity and loneliness are inevitable to me. I will never be One of Them. And that’s All Right.

I could not save her from killing herself. Even when I compared her to the woman I loved most she did not find it in her Heart to save herself just to redeem an Other, even if only to give Peace of Mind to a fellow sufferer she had pretended to be close to. I cannot level with these sorts of “people”. And I do not need to.

I thought everyone would understand. I thought I was being prepared for a World of Vision and Insight. All I ever tried to do was to learn, teach, and retain. I cannot let my own virtues be mitigated by the vices of others, for that violates retention. I can learn from those vices and teach virtue. I can retain my objectivity. That I can do. That is what keeps me going. It’s small wonder that those who most fervently criticize me are teetering on the edge of Death. Evil hands have ways of slitting each other’s wrists.

At the end of the day, I am no different from everyone else. But that is not because we are all fallen and broken. We are all striving towards the same heights, even if we climb different mountains. Some of us see others from a higher vantage point. But I will say this: that the higher that one climbs, the less competition there is. So I think little of who is above me. I have earned my own Equality, even if others have yet to do so. At any rate, I try my best to see them in this way. But I know that this is just a metaphor. The truth is that not one of us truly matters as much as does God’s Will. The truth is that in direct proportion to their failures I have failed as well. The truth is that elitism does not solve poverty or war. But it helps me to retain my objectivity in fighting them. The very Salvation of Humanity is at stake.



DM.A.A.