No one remembers when it was
that William Sawtrey was borne. It is only known when he died, for it was his
death that he was known for. The Roman Catholic priest was the first heretic to
be burnt on behalf of Lollardism, an early Reformation movement predating
Protestantism and founded by John Wycliffe. His outspoken difference of opinion
with the Roman Catholic Church was chiefly negative. A reductionist before
Reductionism was a trend, he rejected the Eucharist, going so far as to burn
alive rather than to admit that the consecrated bread was not in fact anything
more than material. A determinist, he rejected free will as a concept, a choice
(devoid of personal accountability, by its very nature) that would explain why he
so easily fell into the hands of his critics and executioners, only ever
putting up enough of a fight to be called stubborn to the death. Lacking
imagination, he condemned the worship of images as idolatry. Lacking energy,
and of a lazy temperament, he likewise criticized the tradition of religious
pilgrimage.
Sawtrey was not unclever. He
had a peculiar skill for riding the shoulders of giants. Though it’s not known
whether or not he pawned off the work of others as his own, when it came down
to his trial and his own life on the line he did not hesitate to present the
works of Saint John, Saint Paul, and Saint Augustine as his Ethos, quoting them
to the point of name-dropping (if in fact he gave them credit) with precision
and persuasion. Nonetheless, his refusal to accept that the bread on the table
was none other than the Body of Christ resulted quite fatalistically (and
fatally) in his death upon the stake in March of 1401.
That same year saw the birth
of Adolphus VIII, Count of Holstein. A descendant of the House of Schauenburg,
he was by default a vassal of the Holy Roman Empire. Ironically enough, dying
at the hands of the Holy Romans, on behalf of the spiritual world (and largely
a rejection of its incarnation in the flesh), allowed him to grab those same, helping
hands and to use them as a ladder to the top of the material world. Despite his
having been the mightiest vassal of the Danish Realm, his life of privilege was
uneventful and complacent. On the Fifth of March, 1435, he married Margaret of
Hollenstein, and they had one child, but that child died young and Adolphus
VIII passed in 1459 without any descendants, on the fourth of December.
Eighteen days later, a man was
borne in Edirne who came to be known by no other name except for “Sultan Cem”.
He was the son of Mehmed the Conqueror and Cicek Hatun. Cem’s older half-brother,
Bayezid, was supposed to be the proper descendant to the throne, but at the
death of Mehmed there were no formal records found endowing the proper
successor, leaving us to wonder what became of them or why they were never
brought into fruition by the time of Mehmed’s death. Perhaps the answer lies in
this fact: that Mehmed did not die a timely death, and it was doubtful that he
died of “natural” causes. He was ostensibly poisoned, and usually the eldest
brother is suspected of having done so.
A bitter but lackluster
sibling rivalry erupted over the Ottoman throne. The battle began under the
table, in secrecy. The late Mehmed’s Grand Vizier was on Team Cem, apparently,
for he used sleight of hand and stealth in an attempt to enthrone Cem and to
marginalize Cem’s half-brother. Both brothers governed provinces; Bayezid ruled
Sivas, Tokat, and Amasya, whilst Cem ruled Karaman and Konya. Mehmed II was
buried in Constantinople, despite an Islamic law that strictly prohibits the
unnecessary delay of any human burial. The Vizier had hoped that, since Konya
was situated closer to Constantinople than was Amasya, Cem would arrive in time
for the coronation party earlier than his brother would. But this was not to be
so. When the Janissary corps, a network of influential pashas working for
Bayezid, learned of the death and of the Grand Vizier’s plans, (BOTH of which
had been covered up with much greater care and ritual than had the body of
Mehmed Himself) the show was over and the battle began. The Janissary rebelled,
broke into the capital, and lynched the Vizier. But that did not stop the
stubborn Cem. Bayezid finally showed up on the scene and was declared Sultan Bayezid
II, but no more than six days later Cem captured the city of Inegol with an
army of 4000. Bayezid retaliated, trying to kill his brother, but Cem survived
and declared himself Sultan of Anatolia upon May 28, only a week after Bayezid
arrived in Constantinople and took the throne. Cem tried to strike a deal
between the brothers, but Bayezid was either too headstrong or too wise to
Cem’s scheming nature. Bayezid marched on Bursa, Cem’s new capital of Anatolia.
On June 19th, 1481, a decisive battle lost Cem the throne of the
Ottoman Empire, so that he went down in history as a “pretender”.
As tends to be the case with
pretense, however, it is contagious. A Mamluk Sultan by the name of Qa-it Bay
took Cem in with honour to Cairo. It was not long thereafter that the karmic
descendant of William Sawtrey, who in a past life had condemned the entire
concept of pilgrimage, became the only Ottoman Prince to have ever made a
pilgrimage to Mecca. To add spice to an existing irony is that Cem was never
peculiarly religious, failing to convert to Christianity in later life and
showing no real regard for his given faith in Islam. (The hint being that he
could have allowed the Grand Vizier to keep his own father’s body unburied for
the time it took to transport it from Gebze to Constantinople. But then: let’s
not forget that Cem might have had nothing to do with all that, as evidenced by
the remorse it must have taken to exploit the ensuing war for his own power and
benefit.)
In Cairo, a letter from
Bayezid found Cem, offering the younger brother one million akces in order to
stop competing for the throne. Ever the radical, Cem refused, electing instead
to spite Bayezid by launching a campaign in Anatolia. Under the support of
Kasim Bey, the Lord of Ankara and heir to the ruling house of Karaman, Cem took
back Konya on May 27, 1482. His success was short-lived. Bayezid forced Cem to
retreat to Ankara, cornering Cem by blocking all roads back to peace in Egypt.
Cem decided that the time for diplomacy had finally come, and so the brothers
might have resolved their feud under the conditions that Cem live quietly in
Jerusalem, collecting a stipend from his older brother. This was of course
Bayezid’s idea. It was so appealing to Cem, especially the part where he had to
agree to never divide the Ottoman Empire, that he fled to France instead.
Cem had no shortage of helping
hands in Rhodes, making Cairo look by contrast like a celebrity roast. Cem
arrived in Rhodes on July 29 with a head full of imperialistic dreams, and he
was welcomed with honour. Bold and assuming as ever, he asked for protection by
Pierre d’Aubusson, Captain of Bodrum Castle and Grand Master of the Knights
Hospitaller, a religious order also known as The Knights of St. John of
Jerusalem and an egregious number of other names and variations. Cem’s offer in
exchange for Bayezid’s head was peace eternal between the Ottoman Empire and
Christendom. Pierre was a little too smart for him, however. In secret, the
Knight approached Bayezid, concluded a peace treaty without any help from Cem,
and had the Knights of St. John betray Cem. The catch was that Bayezid had to
pay 40,000 ducats a year just for Cem’s maintenance. Even in prison, Cem was
still treated like a prince. This became the leitmotif of Cem’s life. A
priceless treasure as a hostage, Cem remained a thorn in his older brother’s
side, even though he spent most of his remaining life being moved about like a
pawn from one padded cell to an other. The pampered prisoner finally croaked in
Capua on February 25, 1495. During his last years, he had frequently the
opportunity to die a Christian, owing to the patronizing plaints of Pope
Innocent VIII, but Cem refused. The Papacy also failed to convince Cem ever to
involve himself in another crusade. His use was chiefly as bait for his
brother, for threats of releasing him gave him the weaponizing potency of a
poisonous asp. Bayezid kept trying to control Cem furiously, even sending
assassins a few times. But we may never know whether Cem died of poison or of
pneumonia. He was not known for his health.
Even to this day, Cem is
treated with pity and sympathy by historians who ask: “Was he murdered?” with a
tone of tragedy.
When Tuman Bey II was killed
in 1517 A.D, Egypt fell into the hands of the Ottoman Empire, and so fell the
Mamluk Dynasty. The resulting power vacuum in many parts of the Middle East
opened up the floodgates for a number of impostors to usurp the throne.
Pargli Ibrahim Pasha,
sometimes referred to as “The Westerner” or as “The Favourite”, and finally “The
Executed”, was borne in 1495 and lived to become the first Grand Vizier
appointed by Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent. He was enslaved for being Christian
in his youth, but by a twist of luck it was at that same time that he met
Suleiman, who was only one year his senior, and they became childhood friends. Suleiman
took Ibrahim out of the jurisdiction of his captor, Iskender Pasha, and shortly
thereafter ascended to the Ottoman Throne in 1520 A.D. Suleiman granted so many
positions of prestige to his best friend that Ibrahim at one point had to beg
Suleiman to slow the ascent, for fear of arousing jealousy from other viziers.
Suleiman was so moved by this display of modesty that he swore that, under the
reign of Suleiman, Pargli Ibrahim would never be put to death. On June 27, 1523
A.D, little more than six years after the fall of Tuman Bey, Pargli Ibrahim
assumed his post as Grand Vizier. He served for thirteen years, growing by
leaps and bounds. In 1523, he married Muhsine Hatun, the granddaughter of his
former captor Iskender, in what was a luxurious display of political prowess
that grew over the years, with gentle coddling, into a loving marriage. In 1525
he reformed the Egyptian civil and military system. It was not long before his
power rivaled that of Suleiman Himself. He won diplomatic victory upon victory
in service to the Empire, chiefly by posturing himself as the TRUE leader.
Tragically, he did not know when to stop. Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent grew
wary when his Grand Vizier began to refer to himself as a “Sultan”, and the
people were calling Ibrahim all the while “Ibrahim the Magnificent”. Jealousy
became a self-fulfilling prophecy, and eventually Suleiman acquired a Fatwa
from a local cleric, allowing him to break his vow to protect Ibrahim’s life,
in exchange for building a mosque. Pargli Ibrahim Pasha was executed on March
14, 1536. His childhood friend regretted the choice for twenty years, writing
poetry about friendship that was highly suggestive of its reference to the
tragedy. But at least Pargli died rich. He owned about 1300 slaves and had seized
the estate of rival Iskender Celebi. It’s good to be the Vizier.
A RUBBER SHOGUN.
Miles from the heat in the
Middle East, our hero decided to reincarnate as Ashikaga Yoshiteru on March 31,
1536, just seventeen days after his stint ended so tragically in
Constantinople.
The name was of course none
other than the clan Ashikaga, whose primary founding shogun was Ashikaga
Takauji, the reincarnation of Count Guy of Dampierre and Twin Flame of Stefanus
Dusan the Mighty.
Yoshiteru, the thirteenth
shogun in line, was not quite so impressive.
Historians would come to
describe him as a “rubber stamp”. The eldest son of the Twelfth Shogun in the
Ashikaga line, Yoshiteru slid in at the tender age of eleven. He was never
given a second name, but in what was probably an imitation of Imperial custom
he changed it from “Yoshifushi” to “Yoshiteru” in 1554. His name in childhood
was “Kikubemaru”,
the first part of which means “Chrysanthenum”.
Like his father, Yoshiteru was a political
puppet. It was not long after his confirmation as a shogun that the family was
driven out of Kyoto by war with the Hosokawa. In 1552, Yoshiteru finally did
something right by securing a truce with Nagayoshi, allowing himself to return
to Kyoto. But such glorious triumph clearly got the best of Yoshiteru’s fragile
ego. Within the year he and Harumoto turned on Nagayoshi in an act of war.
Friends came to help, and as had been the case in previous lifetimes they won
the battle and lost the war. For five years Rokkaku Yoshikata had Yoshiteru’s
back and all went well, but in 1558 Nagayoshi drove Yoshiteru from Kyoto yet
again with the obstinacy of a tide. But Nagayoshi did not push his luck.
Killing a shogun was very unwise and disreputable, so Yoshiteru’s birth-right
(read: privilege) spared him his life. He was even allowed to return to Kyoto
under Nagayoshi’s supervision, acting the part of the leader whilst Nagayoshi
retained all the real power. What luck!
Nonetheless, what little Yoshiteru could do, he
did well. Many daimyos and samurai made their way to Kyoto to pay respects to this
puppet shogun, including heavy-hitter Oda Nobunaga. He was known for his “inner
strength” and for his skills with a kitana, earning the name “Kengo Shogun”.
Scholars compare him in this way to Takauji.
But then he got greedy. When Nagayoshi died of
illness in 1564, Yoshiteru made a run from the throne. The Council of Miyoshi
was ahead of him, though, and they beat him to the seat of power faster than
you can say “Janissary”. Yoshiteru was killed on June 17, 1565. His squire,
Odachidono, whom a Jesuit missionary described as having been madly in love
with Yoshiteru, slit his own throat and belly with near immediacy afterwards.
The loss and death wiped clean what positive
repute Yoshiteru had managed to accrue for himself and for the daimyo.
Circa 1565 Henry Hudson, after
whom Hudson Strait and Hudson Bay are named, was borne in England. A curious
fellow, in both the sense that he is curious to examine and was himself prone
to examine curiously, Henry became known for his explorations at sea. Ambitious
to the point of idiocy and idiotic to the point of redundancy, he tried to do
what no man had done before: to find a Northeast passage to China on behalf of
the English merchant class. Rather than taking the traditional (and only
physically possible) approach of circumventing Russia, he wound up in North America,
in a feat of misdirection that would have made Columbus blush in envy. In 1611,
having spent the winter on the shore of James Bay, he decided it was time to
press onwards, to the West (the closest route of course having been to the East
from whence they had come). The crew did not see eye-to-eye with his
counterintuitive genius, and they arranged a mutiny. The poor soul was damned
to die at sea, alongside his son and seven other people who were stupid enough
to support him. He is rumoured to have died that very year.
Speaking of 1611:
In May 16th of the year 1611 A.D. Pope Innocent XI was borne. You will remember him as a brief patron for Raffaello Fabretti, the antiquarian who was a other incarnation of Count Dampierre and Ashikaga Takauji. A devout preacher who did not hesitate to use his station to enlighten the masses, Pope Innocent XI had a very hands-on style of papacy. Leading by example, in what could be called a Cult of Personality, he squared the annual deficit and even attained a papal income that surpassed its expenditures. In civilian life, he was a cultural hero in the sense that he closed all of the theatres in Rome and put Roman opera on hiatus, dismissing these trivialities as sources of vice. Though he had nothing against Miguel de Molinos personally, he represented the will of his fellows in condemning the Quietist Mystic as heretical. In regards to the Jews, Pope Innocent was quite compassionate. His edict to abolish Jewish money-lending was delayed twice, despite the tremendous monetary benefits he would have gleaned from a speedier application of the process.
In May 16th of the year 1611 A.D. Pope Innocent XI was borne. You will remember him as a brief patron for Raffaello Fabretti, the antiquarian who was a other incarnation of Count Dampierre and Ashikaga Takauji. A devout preacher who did not hesitate to use his station to enlighten the masses, Pope Innocent XI had a very hands-on style of papacy. Leading by example, in what could be called a Cult of Personality, he squared the annual deficit and even attained a papal income that surpassed its expenditures. In civilian life, he was a cultural hero in the sense that he closed all of the theatres in Rome and put Roman opera on hiatus, dismissing these trivialities as sources of vice. Though he had nothing against Miguel de Molinos personally, he represented the will of his fellows in condemning the Quietist Mystic as heretical. In regards to the Jews, Pope Innocent was quite compassionate. His edict to abolish Jewish money-lending was delayed twice, despite the tremendous monetary benefits he would have gleaned from a speedier application of the process.
Innocent XI was innocent where
women were concerned as well. A papal bull he issued in 1679, entitled
Sanctissimus Dominus, asserted the value of all human life at the fetal stage.
He needed build nothing up; the bull was only designed to tear down an existing
sixty-five propositions in favour of abortion. The chivalry did not end there.
Not only did he put an end to gambling and raised attendance at Holy Communion,
but he all so forbid women to sing on stage in theatres and opera houses.
At 10:00 P.M, on August 12,
1689 A.D, kidney stones finally caught up with Pope Innocent XI. He was
beatified two years later by his successor, Pope Innocent XII. For those of you
who don’t know: beatified does not have anything to do with being beaten.
Innocent XII called Innocent XI a true “Servant of God”.
He was never canonized, (an
other honour, nothing to do with being fired from a cannon) though the Holy
Roman Church thought twice about that in response to the terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001. His successes in having prevented Turks from overrunning
Christendom made him a sort of Christian Saviour for all gentile peoples who
feel the very REAL threat of Islam in their lives. How quaint it is, therefore,
to consider his previous incarnations.
THE ORGANIST.
You are probably wondering now what the writer is wondering: why does this screwball bother to keep reincarnating? As it turns out, there was in fact ONE talent that had been repressed throughout the lifetimes but hat finally found its expression once that repression had reached a papal fever pitch:
You are probably wondering now what the writer is wondering: why does this screwball bother to keep reincarnating? As it turns out, there was in fact ONE talent that had been repressed throughout the lifetimes but hat finally found its expression once that repression had reached a papal fever pitch:
Music.
Having died of kidney stones
in a previous life, Josep Prades i Gallent, borne 1689 A.D, decided to devote
his fresh new life to health and pleasure. He lived to be Sixty-eight, an age surpassing
most of his previous incarnations (though still trumped by the one with the
kidney stones and the dour asceticism). This prosperity was owed to the health
and healthiness of his only occupation: as an organist and composer at the
Valencia Cathedral in Spain. The Baroque composer found a tremendous sense of
inclusion within the Roman Catholic Church, which treated him like an old
friend and patronized him like an even older benefactor. During his Inspired gig
he composed 11 Masses, 24 Motets, 56 Psalms, 1 lonesome Lamentation, 9
Songs, Antiphon, 2 Versos, 3 Passions,
299 Castilian Villancico, 4 cantates, etc. Never a self-employed man, he
finally asked to retire after twenty-nine years of labour in his craft, and
promptly thereafter dropped dead of apoplexy. He died in the same tiny village
wherein he was borne, having lived an ostensibly harmless life, for once.
But such lives are regrettably
short-lived.
Thomas Telford, a Leo at
birth, lived from August 9, 1757 to September 2, 1834 A.D, dying at the age of
77. He was a Scottish civil engineer, architect and Stonemason, which meant
that he had probably been at one point or another inducted into the Masonic Cult
and granted a magickally long life (77 is a number that should sound familiar
to readers of the Story of the Broken Spear, especially in relation to the
witch Ela of Salisbury).
It is hard to say that the
Mason was a bad guy. The “Colossus of Roads” had designed dozens of bridges and
aqueducts, as well as having written some very well-structured poetry, by his
death in 1834. His tendency to remain on the British Isles did not mitigate his
greatness nor his popularity. He even managed to acquire 50,000 pounds in 1823
for the building of churches in
neighbourhoods that had none, christened the “Telford Church”. Given his karmic
past, this was a fortuitous thing to happen in the year ’23.
It is not that a Soul cannot
live a productive life. But karmic habits die hard. And sometimes the vanity of
success is only seen to its logical conclusion across two lifetimes, the latter
representing the failure without which the former could not prosper.
On August 23rd,
1834, Thomas Telford was reported “seriously ill of a bilious derangement”, and
on September 2nd he past away. Four days later, in Georgetown, a
district of Washington, D.C, Samuel Brand Arnold was borne.
In 1865, six men conspired to
kidnap President Abraham Lincoln on the United States. He was intended to be held
captive in a hostage exchange for all Confederate prisoners held in Washington,
D.C. at the time. Not unlike Captain Hudson’s pursuit of the Northeast Passage, it was attempted twice, and
failed both, and not unlike that other fluke, it failed because of a spatial confusion;
Lincoln never happened to be where they thought he would be, any moreso than
China had been in Canada.
Arnold had learned his lesson
about perseverance. He and an other conspirator dropped out of the conspiracy
fairly early on. When one of the remaining four, a Taurus by the name of John
Wilkes Booth, assassinated Lincoln, Arnold was arrested, to his own relief. As
it turned out, he got off lucky. In 1869 he was pardoned by President Andrew
Johnson, and he spent the remaining half of his life reflecting, quite
publically, on his experiences in prison at Fort Jefferson. Most of his records
have probably been lost, though we cannot say for certain how many there were.
Arnold the Traitor died on
September 21, 1906. Four days later, the world gained an other musical prodigy.
Jaroslav Jezek was borne in Prague, “to the family of a tailor”. His work as a
composer, conductor, and pianist pushed into the avant-garde whilst remaining
grounded and rooted firmly always in his Czechoslovakian roots, even after
Nazism obligated him to move to New York City. The first half of his career was
influenced directly by Stravinsky, Les Six, and Arnold Schonberg, whereas the
second half was a style of his own. He composed jazz, classical, and film
music. Of all his lifetimes, this Libra could be rivaled only by Josep the
Organist in terms of success and harmlessness. Jezek brought a certain
human-heartedness to the tradition of orchestral music that elevated the
trashiness of modernity to an exalted human virtue, almost to such a degree
that one forgot the possibility of being human without it. “Rubbish Heap”, “Tiger
Rag”, “Chinatown, My Chinatown”, and the catchy “Bugatti Step” all capture the
emotion of a human being that has embraced its own machinery as part of its
organism. He died on January 1st, 1942.
THE COSMONAUT.
Ukrainian pilot cosmonaut
Aleksandr Yakovlevich Petrushenko must have been on something good when he was
borne, because his life was one long synchronicity, beginning on the first day
of the year 1942 and ending no more or less than fifty years, ten months and
ten days later.
On October 23rd of
the year 1965, on the cusp of Drama and Criticism, and the Day of
Synchronicity, he was one of only seventeen cosmonauts selected for an elite
training program.
Inexplicably, however, he left
the team in 1973. He never flew in space.
Due to lung cancer, probably
as a complication from the Russian Cigarette Habit, he died on November eleventh,
1992.
Yet again, Hudson was
thwarted, and, as always had been the case, by his own impatience and
disloyalty.
In 2015, it was this same
tragic flaw that dissolved the Suburban Shamans. Kresten Xavier Taylor (whose
name means “A Christian Saviour, of the Family of a Tailor”) continued to
pursue a fairly lackluster musical career. His hobbies to this day include
drugs, poker, mysticism, reading my blog, and gossip at the expense of his old
benefactors and present rivals. He was of course borne in November of 1992.
Dm.A.A.
No comments:
Post a Comment