Rage: Black Lives Don't Matter.

Rage: I find it ironic when people use such Orwellian phrases as "Black Lives Matter". As though "black" were a material quality. What are YOU projecting? I am going back to reading. Why not just say "Black Lives don't Matter"? Then you would say: "Blackness is not a material quality." Is that too "smug and condescending" for you? To take the higher plane of consciousness. May be I do not fear your rage so much as my own. Y'all are supposed to be literate and not Fascists that throw about mindless slogans whose meaning depends entirely upon a Mass, fragmented context, in an infinitely self-referential post-modern language game that has the intellectual merit of Farmville that does not even bother to de-construct its self. If you are going to reify people and then reify your own logocentric prejudices leave me out of it; you are feeding the fire. Dmitry. P.S. Sorry if this is too precise to be superimposed over an unnerving photograph and to be parroted as a slogan. I suppose that no one as usual cares about what the Jewish book-worm has to say; dismissing him as "white" is enough reason to stop reading part way through. I forgive you. You expose your selves to more hostile Fascist rhetoric than alcohol. Cheers. I am going back to my books. There is an internal war to be fought and whatever the Mass tells me isn't going to make me any more sane. What do people care what the lunatic says? If we all could describe a single moment with the phenomenological accuracy that is due to a report there would not be a single staff-nurse at a Mental Hospital. But no. Oppress away. Stir up meaningless issues that can have no proof. Label people. Go insane your selves. Ride the wave of progressive thinkers that were cleverer than you. What do I care? I should be used to being persecuted for my state of consciousness by now. And so long as people make more money off of racism than actual oppression, so long as the very people that denounce "structural violence" are themselves unblushing structuralists, and so long as they project not only their own logocentric prejudices but their own logocentrism upon people, I probably should not bother. Slogans galore it is. I can weave them together as well as the next fuck. Too deep for you? Check your privelege.

Dm.A.A.

Why Vaccinations should Never be Forced. Part One.

I noticed some of your posts regarding ticks carrying a new virus. I am skeptical. You probably do not want to hear this. But my recent greatest burden has been some thing a friend of mine brought to my attention. His name is Nic DeMarco and he has a cyst in his brain which is fairly out-wardly noticeable. It was ostensibly the result of a vaccination that went awry.

There will soon be a law in effect unless we manage to stop it that not only forces people to take mandatory vaccinations against all these "viruses" but that all so allows companies to tell the scientific method to screw off basically in passing vaccinations if they want to. This was what Big Pharmaceutical companies did with experimental drugs such as Risperdal and Depakote. I should know: I was put on them during a time in my life that I was following a cult and hanging out with some one who had major P.T.S.D. they triggered psychotic symptoms.

The way that pharmacists justify this is by saying "We do not know how these drugs work. But they do." Usually these are not the people taking them. Vaccinations are equally experimental. And this bill (Nic knows the exact legal jargon for it) basically lets them get away with any thing.

as was wisely put by Peter Joseph if you see it on the main stream media it is either unimportant or aimed at furthering an agenda. Not to be "tin-foil-hate" but I come from a country called the Soviet Union where people learned to be skeptical of the information they were being fed. What is even scarier than propaganda is realising that it is not true...

Mainstream media out-lets, who basically form a conglomerate with governments by virtue of such legislation as the T.P.P. (look it up! or don't. Either way though:) make all naysayers look like fools. This is why the stereotypical denouncer of forced immunity is believed to think that vaccines create autism...

well. This is a formal fallacy. Actually there are several fallacies in this...

1. The Strawperson Fallacy. We do not believe that. Autism is pretty much intense introversion. There is no "autism spectrum"; we are ALL on the autism spectrum! If you will pardon the paradox; why call it autism if we all have it? Some people are just more introverted than others...

2. The Fallacy of Begging the Question. It's like saying: You do not believe in vaccinations, so you MUST believe this ridiculous myth that vaccines cause mental disorders.

In fact, I believe in neither mental disorders (the D.S.M.) for vaccinations. Both are in the hands of Big Pharma.

*nor vaccinations

3. Where do you think that "ridiculous rumours" come from? Even despite the prevalence of Illuminati videos the people who believe in them are a ridiculed minority. I have many views that barely get any hits on youtube, whereas meghan Trainor is every where. So who is really in charge of widely held beliefs in the Mass? The media! And by circulating these rumours and then shutting them down they create a propaganda hoax.

As the post-structural philosophers said: All language only refers to other language. All media only refers to other media.

Again: Sorry if this was not what you wanted to read at the moment. I was curious about what you were posting on-line. You seem like an interestin and intelligent educated person. Whether you agree or not, sincerely, Dmitry.

Dm.A.A.

The Vulgar are Luminous: Chapter One.

The Vulgar are Luminous: Chapter One.

'Do you have impending feelings of Doom?

Does it feel like tomorrow will never come?

Are you feeling hopeless or depressed about the Future?

If you answered 'yes' to any of these questions, you may suffer from I.T.D.

What is I.T.D.?

I.T.D. Is a rare disorder caused by an imbalance of serotonin in the brain.

Thankfully, there is a solution:

Cerebratax.

Cerebratax has been proven by clinical studies to effectively treat I.T.D....'

'Who are clinical studies?'

'Huh?' replied Marc Blankenship as he lifted his forefinger momentarily, with measured hesitation, from the steering pad.

'What are clinical studies?' his son, Blake, repeated, watching the dancing snakes of laser-lights and neon whiz by from the back seat, and smiling gently in wonder at them.

'Clinical studies,' began Blake's father, catching his attention as he more firmly grimaced towards the road ahead, 'are observations made by scientists and doctors about...'

'Like Doctor Shannon?'

'Right,' replied Marc after a moment's hesitation, and with deliberate patience, 'Except Dr. Shannon is a practising doctor. They have other people in the scientific profession who run tests on drugs called 'pharmaceuticals' before someone like Dr. Shannon can prescribe them to you.'

But Blake's eyes had already returned to the window, his ears immersed in the hum of the surrounding world beyond the cubic frame of their zooming vehicle. His father raised one eyebrow over the other, as he had always been apt to do so when ignored, and, with equally methodical fidelity, maintained an unchanged look in his glassy eyes.

'Dad,' Blake mused.

'Hm?!' his father acknowledged his son with an almost-snarl, which Blake was too accustomed to to be upset or even surprised by.

'What if all people followed predictable patterns?' Blake continued, eyes flying out the window with the leaves of trash as father and son zoomed through the Forest.

'I don't know,' came Dr Blankenship's passionately unclimactic reply, as he peered through his least favourite place to fly in with a glare that seemed almost like a futile attempt to bring their destination closer to them.

1.

Phoenix decided to disregard Nestor’s comment on the social networking web site: It’s just probably going to be long and contrived.

He heard Nestor’s voice all ready in his head. Sporadic and manic: But what about all the times YOU went on for FIFTEEN MINUTES?

What the fuck does it matter, Nestor? What I had to say then MATTERED. What you have to say DOESN’T. Obviously if you have to level with me you have nothing more of interest to say. You were the one who demanded a constant warrant. That you would prioritise your ego over the issue and make this an affair of the Soul and not of Reality is enough of a reason for me to disregard your entire frame of reference. And allow me to finish. OBVIOUSLY the art is one of being complex but not complicated, simple but not simplistic. All life is paradoxical and it is a stab in the gut and a slap in the face to be held accountable for all of one’s contradictions as though they were all symptoms of hypocrisy. If your life makes sense still, good for you. Others are suffering at the expense of your privilege. Incidentally I TRY to be concise on this web site. I have nothing to learn from you and that you would equate what I have to say with what you have to say is evidence that you have not seen beyond the boundaries of your perverse ego.

Dm.A.A.

Let it Fall Apart.

Let it Fall Apart.

There is really no such thing as a society. What we call society or the system is the projection of an individual psyche upon a confluence of forces too complex to even comprehend. So never fear the collapse of such a system. It is merely a loss of innocence.

Feeding the world begins with recognizing that food is a universal human right. That begins psychoanalytically with the Self. We cannot gain total independence but we can gain ethical independence. The system will not fall sooner if we stall later; the longer that we conform to it the later it will change. We must not entertain sentimental feelings that are conditional for those who provide for us, for gratitude is debt and debt is a bondage to past karma. Those who are addicted to their habits will deny this, and to the degree that they can fathom this addiction to that same degree they will be passionate in fighting Change.

Those who fed us yesterday may become enemies today. They were surely enemies yesterday. Tomorrow everyone will eat without debt. Today they say that you should be grateful that they had a job so they could feed you. Yesterday they had a job. Today they lost it. One step closer to paradise. That energy that was expended in the service of one paradigm will now fuel a new world order. No one is in charge of it; no one knows how to run this. Those who claim to know are merely specialists in manipulation. Many of them have their selves duped.

“The vulgar are luminous, knowing. I alone appear dull and confused.”

Of course, we are all confused. Could we ever once agree about what “society” is, or even “Reason” or “ethics”, there would be no politics, philosophy or religion. The individual is the only thing there really is; society is an abstraction. I do not need to put that phrase in quotations and ascribe them to Jung to make this self-evident point clear. And Gnosis is all ways self-evident; the intelligent merely lend words to enter it into the inter-subjective sphere. It is only propaganda that opposes it. But Shiva will crush the dwarf. Its blood will feed the starving children. Do not be afraid to appear mad in expectation of it. Do not be afraid to be mad in expectation of it. No one expected the Inquisition. No one expected the Holocaust (except Nietzsche). No one expected Agrarian society (except the ancients). Over the course of history this was available to a few who were systematically silenced but not entirely forgotten.

The process of transformation is its own reward. What hostility we project upon others is usually if not invariably our own. The Zen Buddhists would have gone so far as to all most say that we can be entirely unaffected by the surrounding world. The temptation for them was to detach completely.

Virtue is its own reward. Intelligence and Good will are the two essential and indispensable and important things. Life is a process of growth so it is fruitless to regret the past. The past has passed. It would not be the present now were it not different. And if the present is an improvement upon the past then that should be celebrated rather than the past condemned. The Japanese have a word (I do not remember) for elevating another without putting down one’s self. Surrender guilt. The past is the past. Do not blame it for the success of its follower, as though the former could be jealous of the latter. That kind of resentment is only felt by people who are sore losers, be it in a game or an argument. If I seem to be a proponent of irresponsibility, I assure you that it is not for my benefit but for yours. My children will not grow up embarrassed to be alive. And in a world where gratitude is not forced but kindled involuntarily through openness and kindness, there will be less to forgive as there will be more to live for. I am not fan of the scape-goat as a technique. But nor am I a fan of guilt in general. Punishment solves nothing; publicity only gives the example set by the deviant more power. It will not influence my feelings towards my fellow man. And if you accuse me further of evasion I will make your wish come true and evade, for I do not need you to tell me who to be. The delight of being my self is enough.

Courage is necessary. Wisdom is recognizing when others stumble in the dark. The ego all ways becomes jealous and tries to blame the Bigger Man. No worry. “Cruel, but everybody does it. Thought by now I’d rise above it.” What naivete is there in a Hope that is immediately full-filled? Who can really judge except those who crave power and have hatred in their hearts? Christ was crucified because people hate hearing about Love as much as the ego hates Shiva’s foot. But hate loses in the end, I’ve heard. We could all die out and the Universe would be just fine; it would have no longer the pimple of the human race to pass judgment upon its unfairness as the occupants of planet Earth harm one another. Kindergarten boys would all ways say “Life is not fair” to justify their own unfairness. Why did they choose such as Life?

Some thing in us is stirred in a righteous anger to lift our fists in opposition to oppression. I hate that, though I should not. It is a power attitude and an act of hypocrisy. Why lift our fists to aggravate the problem? Did shame ever solve a thing? Did it not open up more shame? More paranoia and exhaustion? A weaker human community where in more dropped out and returned to the wild, haunting the civilized beings like a splinter? A feeble imitation of humanity that could not stifle one act of deviance without spinning off so many more? Never does a horror justify a horror, or seldom does it. It certainly does not resolve a social problem, but only an individual thirst that is satiated in collective blood-lust. Yet that example in turn justifies more deviance. The deviant has a form of courage, if a perverted one, by acting out the shadow of the masses and defying their cruelty by showing them a mirror. We rage at mirrors a lot.

Wherever you may find your self recognize that life is in harmony. But harmony is not stagnant or perfect. It is not “balance”. It is dynamic. You contain the Universe within you and it contains you. This stuff gets easier to understand when you have experienced four-dimensional thought. There is nothing in you that is unnatural, and time will guide you through your fear.

Dm.A.A.

One last attack against Leveling.

There is one last reason never to level with people, and this will be some what abstract: It turns every one into a hypocrite. Think about it: In so simple a frame of reference, what alternative have you? Consider the man who says: Stop killing my people! He then kills a soldier from the oppressing army and is accused of hypocrisy. By leveling – by reduction, by the refusal to Think – he is accused of commiting murder whilst denouncing murder. Yet of course his gesture was consistent with his principles: He was stopping the murder of his people. By only pointing out the commonality – killing – and ignoring the difference, the judge of the matter takes a side. It is impossible not to take a side. Any ambivalence is a pretension towards peace, for so far as one side is stronger than another then ambivalence just prioritises the oppressor passively-aggressively. By dismissing the motives underlying an action, which of course pass our threshold of understanding consciously, we become oppressors by equating “behavior” with goodness.

Dm.A.A.

Why we are Not Equal.

Why we are Not Equal.

Your argument against my natural humane aversion towards leveling is nothing short of circular – the same kind of circularity you claim to denounce. The only warrant you could provide in favour of leveling is an aversion to elitism. And this is the kind of oppressive dominator attitude that would compel me, if I cared less, to never talk to you again. You have nothing in common with me. We are not “equal”; you have not worked towards the attainment of such an ideal. Equality is a linear mathematical concept, not a quality of character. By equality all that you mean to say is that we are held to a common standard in the eyes of your God, and we are recognized as having an equal vote in the system of your State. You do not care about me and the solitary sufferings that brought me to my place in time. You want the world to treat you “equally”, pandering to your entitlement, as an a priori with out having earned the right. You are absurd. Equality cannot exist between two sovereign entities, for equality is a similarity, a continuity, and not a difference. Were we equal not only would we have no disagreements; we would all so have no dignity, for our differences and not our similarities unify us. Only a jealous God, the projection of an oppressive State, could force us to humble our selves before him, to stifle our natures and our tendencies to grow and to be uninhibited by each other in our growth. Only a jealous and oppressive person would stifle the growth of another and force that other to conform, dismissing all differences of situation, perception, and opinion that makes life magical and that makes decision-making arduous by playing the Fascistic, God-forsaken “equality” card. As though Excellence were not a private attainment! As though we all REQUIRED a kind of nihilistic ambivalence and absence of preference in order to co-exist! There exists surely a Higher Plain towards which a few (and God have I wished to delude my self that it was more) ascend where in there is no pain but only struggle, where no reference is made in capitalistic schizophrenia to a remote “equality”, as though we were mere dots on a line, and what is more not even dots but ONE dot, and where each strives towards one’s own Excellence with out interference with another’s private path, for each answers to one’s own private God and this relationship is so personal that only that God knows whether or not every private God is the same. Yet most have not risen to that plane. Only a few, far in between, make any sense, can offer any sanity or reprieve, and they comprise a network that is accessible to a select few as well, for while these texts are available their significance is lost on the masses who would rather parrot a collective hatred. How many times in a madness did I PRETEND that this was not so, and how much time did I waste.

You have nothing in common with me. Your relationships with each other, where in you cloister each other from the world, are every thing I will not be. If we had any thing in common we would not argue, and if we argued in spite of a hidden commonality then Life would be Absurd, but I refuse to settle for so de-moralising a proposition. You have more hatred in you than do I (I only have anger), and you clump with others for they are an out-let for this hatred. My individuality is an attack upon your conspiracy, my metaphysics an attack upon your Fascist dream of a common reality where in you, as the oppressive, dominating, capitalist Christian American pigs that you are, are justified in ruining my family and all that I love because you have influence and you call that goodness. There is no access that I have to your romance and so (though not because, but rather in addition) you have no access to mine. It is literally impossible to compare and to assign it the arbitrary value of “equal”. Leave California for once in your life and see how much people in other parts of the world care about your pretension towards “equality”. When to be similar is accorded a greater dignity than to be different, the motive is all ways that of assimilation to the Borg – of hegemony. And if you are still unconvinced and you have the nerve to equate my love with “yours”: Remember that you alone think this, and we do not. That is the final test and proof, for so long as we disagree on this point there is no equality between us. It is like any other sign assigned arbitrarily as a gesture of power, for Life does not operate according to the feeble principles of mathematics: Only the panicking and calculating mind of a dictator. Life has not requirement for Leveling because the process of freedom is a constant over coming of the Majority, of the Status Quo, and of Human Nature: A never-resolved, indefinitely undefined re-evaluation and re-definition of what it means to be Human. If God is a parent then He lets his children play unwatched and to decide for their own selves what they pretend their selves and each other to be. To break with Equality is simply to Become: To break with the undifferentiated Mass that is meaninglessness and Nihilism and to find in piercing this myst a GENUINE love for those around one’s self, who all so break this myst and excel in their own solitary way, and whose differences lend them a value that, were we all subsumed to a common self, would yield to hatred, for nothing is more repulsive than the Self. Power all ways tries to subsume things to the Self; Love admires the Other, and the Other can never be reduced to a set of mathematical qualities or bullied by conventional morality. If this seems illogical and unwarranted it is only because my experience and study have brought me to a different quality of Reasoning. Yet as Wittgenstein said the mind is all ways logical; this is not a dispute of the mind but of the Heart, and your Heart, you admit, is corrupt. You force your failing religion upon me in a hope to lend it value you ask me for advise to salvage your Soul but reject what you hear in response as heresy. Yet again: Whatever “equality” that you project upon the world is a manifestation of your Will to Power and nothing more. Whatever value you universalize will be like wise corrupt. That acknowledging another’s individuality, another’s plight and solitude, another’s oppression, another’s humanity and upheaval, another’s pilgrimage, another’s madness, is an attack upon your ego, it only reflects your egoism. You want the world to be only as you see it. You want us all at once to compete for a common goal and yet you want never to have any one talk down to you. In short you want some thing impossible except to a schizophrenic: Constant competition in an objective world but without objective superiority. This is madness. And hence you cannot allow it to be admitted within your self and can only project it upon others. I have no interest in competing with you, so I have no interest in leveling with you. No set of rules is necessary that I do not abuse my power; I do not desire power. In place of constant competition, why not in stead constant struggle, and not against others, as though to subvert them, but to overcome one’s own self? Surely then you would understand that you have no business judging another when another has known more of genocide, or of madness, or of religion, and you would know your place in these instances and have no problem asserting your superiority in others? But you must clearly have no superiority of your own; your life has been too much a bed of roses. No? Then why not admit it? If you can still cling to a feeble, jealous God, those roses could not have been too thorny. If in hearing of genocide you feel that this is the same genocide you read about on Wikipedia, if in hearing of madness you think that this is the same madness that you “dealt with” with your mother, who was no more than a frustration to you for you dealt with it but did not Dwell In it, and if in hearing another’s religion you must immediately turn a matter of the deepest personal subjectivity into a contest, as though my God had insulted your God’s honor, as though we were children of rival parents, or as though we were rival children of the same parents and you felt that I was claiming some favouritism in His eye, your offense is, as Kierkegaard said, a failure to comprehend the moment. It says more of you than it does of me, and all though you are desperate to find your self with in me unfortunately there is no commonality between us. Go in stead to your friends who will cater to your power attitude and share in the lower pleasures of the world.

In a world where one cannot excel, cannot surpass, cannot travel farther than others have dared and cannot contend with other masters, there is no human dignity, for there is nothing one can give to others and be met with generosity. Like wise in a world where there is no competition with others but with the self, where goals are not assigned but Found and where the individual strives towards a private end, there equality does not matter. There is no objective criteria that fits all, and it is useless as a policy. Compassion there is difference and inequality, for we are not dots on a line, much less one dot. We are scattered across the Multiverse, of which each of us is a private Center and one's own final adversary.

Dm.A.A.