On Repetition.
When something or another is repeated, it is no longer real.
This is why it is the mark of neuroticism to think the same thing twice and the
mark of madness to repeat the same thing again and again in anticipation of
different results.
Yet how does one distinguish repetition from constancy, or
either from novelty?
The answer: At the point that there is no conceivable
difference between the desire [and intent] to perform a repetition and the
repetition ITSELF, there is also no boundary between the construction of Truth
[as fabrication] and its finding. All distinctions between a proper execution
of a mental exercise and the improper execution dissolve. We know only that we
have done something properly because we can remember having done it. At the
moment that we intend to Perpetuate Naiively the Old, we all ready remember, so
we have no way of knowing after we have made an effort to repeat whether or not
we had in fact repeated at all. So it becomes impossible to know whether or not
the repetition was successful. Nothing New was attained, because we (had) all
ready (been) [K]new.
Dm.A.A.
No comments:
Post a Comment