The greatest danger with leveling is that you can never
criticise any one without being suspected A PRIORI (as opposed to a posteriori,
but rather with out due cause) of hypocrisy. “Who are you to say this?” is an
idiomatic form of bureaucratic democracy. It is predicated upon the conditioned
Christian notion that we are all rotten to the core (as opposed to the Genuine
Christian notion that God Loves His Children) and that all well-wishers and
nay-sayers are suspect. The proto-Fascism of Hobbes, who believed that man
should never rebel against his government, because he could not surpass his own
ethical egoism (which is bunk; it is simply difficult to find one’s altruism
and adhere to it, especially in the midst of rampant cynicism), is prevalent
ironically through out America to-day, as an exceedingly stifling set of Social
Norms takes precedence over Individual Responsibility and Existential Freedom.
By leveling you over-step my boundaries. You narrow your
view and take every idiom I use to try to level with you out of context. Now
that I am suspect I can never say that I am a victim, because you refuse to be
seen as the moral inferior that you are when you wrong me. The lines disappear,
all men are equally inferior, and all men become savages. I can never stand up
for my self without feeling GUILTY for the wrongs done to ME. And as conformism
grows, enflamed by this distorted sense of ethical imperative, it becomes more and
more difficult for me to find my voice to yell: I was wronged!!!
Leveling is hegemonic, and the people who accuse elitists of
hegemony are only projecting their own impulses. Fitting since they have done
all in their reckless power to tear down all boundaries of decency that would
make it clear that THEY are responsible for their own wrong-doing. But *I* shan’t
be fooled and take the blame for it.
Dm.A.A.
No comments:
Post a Comment