Women in the
End Times:
Feminism can
be seen as symptomatic of the spiritual decline that comes at the end of the
Kali Yuga. It is the loss of sexual power that women had since Matriarchy, and
with that comes the gradual substitution for Eros of Power. So it follows that
newer sedimentary layers of history progressively depict the female sexual
power of the past as a weakness, not unlike the neo-Nietzschean rejection of
Virtue and Valour as weaknesses rather than strengths.
Soft-cored
pornography is the gourmet version of which ordinary pornography is the
gourmand. A gentleman who has pulled off a successful business deal or creative
venture would rather come home to a courtesan than to a whore. “Softcore” is
but a reductionistic label for the sophisticated; it suggests that “hardcore”
is at once more vulgar and banal, as well as more extreme. In this sense it is
no surprise that “hardcore” is perceived to be a greater test of masculinity,
producing brutish traits in both men and the feminists who imitate them.
“Softcore”
is therefore a more diminutive phrase than “gourmet”, and its implications are
on a reductionistic scale. Yet feminism is even more reductionistic. By
substituting for the sexual encounter of Art the polarity of man-as-subject and
woman-as-object, feminism does not only objectify the woman, nor does it simply
objectify the man; it objectifies their VERY RELATIONSHIP to one an other. Each
is reduced from Thou to It, and for the erotic instinct is substituted the will
to power.
In this
sense feminism is a clear mistake, for it rallies the entire force of peer
pressure and social pressure against the male subject, as well as the female
subject. The temptation that the weight re-enforces, a weight under which many
men [and women] buckle, is the classic will to dominate. It offers power as a substitute
for love, because it cannot celebrate Eros as a mutual relationship. Such a correspondance
[sic] is much too mystical for so self-interested and degenerate an ideology.
The ideology
of feminism is and has all ways been a symptomatic branch extending from the
tree of Kali Yuga masculinism. It is disempowering to all genders. One wishing
to survive these times with conscience in tact would do well to remember Eros.
The damsel in distress represents the repressed femininity that must be rescued
from the hypocritical dragon of masculinism-feminism. The force of Culture feeds
the dragon. Culture is a product of ideology. Feminism is the same dragon that
it claims to target.
Feminism is an ideology of Mars and the Martian Virtues, not of Venus.
Feminism is an ideology of Mars and the Martian Virtues, not of Venus.
Dm.A.A.
P.S. The last photograph is credited to Irina Ionesco. These are all images of Sylvia Kristel.
P.S. The last photograph is credited to Irina Ionesco. These are all images of Sylvia Kristel.
No comments:
Post a Comment