I must have realized it then. She
did not CARE about whether it was that I was wrong or she; she only cared about
how I had made her feel. Irrespective of my motives, and with absolutely no
respect for my role within the Group, a group assembled for one common purpose,
she defied my will. Yet she had no right to do this. This was not some vehicle
for her own interests any more so than it was for mine. I would not be
condemned to that burden, and neither would I allow her to bear it. It is true
that my troubled experience had imbibed in me the notion that a man can only
trust his own conscience in any group. But this was supposed to have been a
group of FRIENDS and ENTHUSIASTS, not conformists. How then could she hold it
against US that I had obligated her to CONFORM in the interest of the Common
Good, when we had all ready been established as trustworthy authorities?? It’s
not as though I would have turned against this group, as she did, at the moment
that I might be outvoted. All night I asked repeatedly for confirmation. But
this autistic retard seemed to believe that I was supposed to read her PASSIVE
AGGRESSION in place of a justifiable argument. And wherefore was this the case?
How did the sociopathic leech imagine that my “failure” to read a social cue
was evidence for social maladaptation on MY part? I literally had the
OBLIGATION to withhold my own projections until affirmation for my suspicions,
reasoned and orderly, arrived. And it only came after I had all but DEMANDED
it, and without apology for having been withheld hitherto. Who gave her the
right to withhold this information from her fellows, if it was the Truth? And
her immediate instinct was to CONTRADICT me when I ASSURED that slug that I had
had no interest whatsoever in controlling the situation. If she is so DAMNED
sympathetic to her PARENTS, WHY then would she ignore what I don’t doubt they
would have taught her, as all parents should: that situations NEED TO BE
controlled for the Common Good, and for that reason you must comply with the
wishes of your fellows, insofar as they prove equally compliant, that you might
spare others the BURDEN of being forced to control you?
I did not sleep that night. I
would have approached the group nearby, my eye set on a delightful black-haired
specimen with an ostensibly generic-looking boyfriend. All of a sudden,
however, two things happened when my false friend vocalized her schizotypal
delusions: I felt myself to be in the presence of an In-Group that was
nonetheless devoid of purpose and only provided shelter for a schizophrenic
from the Out-Group. It was at this moment that I recognized within me most
palpably the longing to escape into that Other Group. I realized that I had no
intention of stealing that man’s girl. If she should happen to become my
friend, and if they should part in my favour, it would not have been a betrayal
on my part but an extension of kindness. I would have by then assessed her
boyfriend’s character and decided upon whether his interests were mine or
alien, for in such times as these one must draw that line frequently, and one
cannot betray a man who never was a formal friend. I had the perfect pitch,
too: I was in the company of actors. It was at this same Diner that I had met
these actors, and just as easily upon a whim. Yet at that moment I felt at once
a drive to prove my loyalty to the Human Slug that sat at my left hand and to
clear my name of all ill motives ascribed to me, ensuring that my example would
be followed. With pain I watched the black apple of my eye, with her petite
physique and her upturned nose, leave the table beside her own companions. I
took notice of her buttocks, their figure exposed by the white pants, and I for
once had to confess to myself that I too admired the female figure, even at its
basest level.
I did not sleep that night. Today
I lumbered into the Book Store and cracked open “After Virtue” by Alasdair
MacIntyre. The dry Capricorn Scotsman was the Father That I Never Had. I
deplored him, but only in character. In truth I saw so much of myself in his
every nuance. I was all ways capable of justifying my ostensibly
self-interested behavior because I actually HAD values that were so nuanced and
complicated and such a Herculean task to balance that they required constant
analysis and revision before and after the fact. But these bitches did not
care. They only wanted a member of the pack, and not a leader interested in
Human Solidarity. The moment that I tried to lead them, they accused me. The
moment that I defied them, they felt their accusations to be validated, for
they found sufficient fault with me to condemn me for defying the pack in both
my attempts to lead and in my attempts to transcend by seeking preferable
company outside of it. If I rejected the accusation of ill will the second
time, I was dispossessed of the right to have “accused” the first time. If I rejected
the first accusation, making it clear that it was never my intention to accuse,
but that I had to now that they had behaved so antisocially and with such
depraved cowardice, I was dismissed and disbelieved.
I would have deserved the woman
in the white pants.
There is a reason that I did not
sleep this last night.
It is called the Anniversary
Effect.
It was three years ago upon a
Sunday that I lost my Light of Love. She died by the same diabolical device.
And all I could do when I set
down MacIntyre and picked up Astrology was to look up Scorpio. Even when I
flipped through Pisces, my own SIGN, I was not so thorough. I guess it’s true
how self-effacing we are. After all: my very BIRTHDAY is this Saturday. I turn
twenty-seven years of age. And I am still a virgin. And I am letting some
delusional entrepreneur’s all-but-underage girlfriend call my shots with a
passive aggressive pout. I tried to fall asleep when I got home. But I could
not manage it. I could only drift in daydreams, tormented and depressed to the
point all most of tears that I had taught myself to never shed, disillusioned
and triggered all at once. How can any one tell me to move on when nothing
changes? All my enemies are still alive. My most beloved friends are dead or
dispossessed, with only a few exceptions. And Society does not even reward me
for either my patience nor my chastity. How dare that scum accuse me of self-interest
as though the World revolved around HER, and not the lot of us? Why should I ever
accommodate HER when I know her behavior all ready to be in error? What right
has she earned to complain? None.
And all that grates my ears is that
voice in my head: you did not get what YOU wanted. As though I had not EARNED
yet the love of a woman. As though I’d not EARNED the Moral High Ground. As
though my ongoing chastity were not a testament to my beneficent intent. As
though I could not seek the fulfillment of my own bodily needs and spiritual
attainment with some sense of TACT. And as though to insult me at a time such
as this were not all most as egregious a crossing of boundaries, especially
when I am IN THE ACT OF SERVICE TO THE COMMON GOOD, as was the series of
betrayals and abuses that I have spent the first seven years of my twenties
trying to recover from. No THEORETICAL ill will or selfishness on my part could
justify an ACTUAL abuse; no one has the right to be that paranoid out of MERE
self-defense. I seldom if ever was. Much I tolerated before I cut any cord or
burnt any bridge. And it is neither ill will nor selfishness to seek one’s own
fulfillment once it is overdue. Even less so is it to make the noble sacrifice
of one’s own individuality for some sense of solidarity under a Beneficent,
Established Cause. Ill will is only at the DELIBERATE and UNJUSTIFIED EXPENSE
of an other; either accidental expense or justifiable expense do not count. And
the latter is only justifiable if it is all ready in the spirit of redressing a
grievance, and only at the expense of the wrongdoer, and in proportion to not
only the wrongdoing but the NEED of the aggrieved. No human being would allow
others to be disadvantaged only to prevent pain to his or herself. If they
WOULD inflict pain to himself or herself, he or she is only justified insofar
as he likewise prevents their pain, for it is possible they don’t INTEND to
inflict harm at all, and that what the witness perceives to be a threat to his
or her well-being is in fact only available to perceive by avenue of the same would-be
assailant’s generosity of trust. Yet all theoretical distinctions of ill will
and good will become unequivocal at the moment of ACTION. When a coward betrays
its friends, this is known, and it is unjustified. And I never did that.
So that is perhaps why these are
the only warnings that the book on Astrology gave me: to avoid escapism (which
is never in the Reasoning of MacIntyre so much as in the cynicism in his spite
that tries to justify so many other forms of escape), to avoid Bad Company, and
to avoid Negative Moods.
I deserve better. And I will
never again allow those who prioritize their own feelings OVER mine to darken
my doorstep. If they cannot reconcile their passions with a Common Good, then
that is THEIR failing and THEIR inferiority to me. I am not so blind that I
would not perceive it. My feelings are never of lesser import than any other’s.
And this import is Absolute. My happiness cannot be less important TO any one,
least of all those close to me. It simply IS. And I vow to prioritize it. That,
at least, is the Loving response to my predicament. If I chose Death over Love,
my own Death would not top my list, but rather that of those who all ready
tried to place themselves before me. Yet I feel that soon I shall move beyond
the need to desire vengeance. It was only ever a service to those who betrayed
me and all ready died because of it, through no fault of my own.
Dm.A.A.
That's what you got from this? You cant be around people who don't put you first. If that isn't ironic idk what is .You complain about people who want their happiness but you are demanding people put your happiness first because it's important to you.
ReplyDeleteYou're the definition of an ironic looser, I hope you know that .
You prioritize your happiness over that of others; you are not altruistic. Self-interest is impermissible; only altruism builds heroic societies. When one is surrounded by altruists, one knows the joys of being prioritized, not by oneself, but by the Other. Naturally, it follows that this is a higher form of satisfaction than self-interest can ever produce.
DeleteThere can be no error in preferring happiness by avenue of the altruism of others rather than the self-interest of oneself.
Delete