Racism as solution to Gangs. (Alternate Template.)

Racism as solution to Gangs.

1.  What the millennial generation describes as “racism” is the sum of efforts made to curb organised violence.

2.  Racism as Guilt-by-Association only applies in those communities where-in gangs are power full. (I.E. South Central Los Angeles.) These are all so communities (and agencies, such as the L.A.P.D.) with the most common reputation for their Being-“racist”. They are covered by media in a way that plays to the pit of the prejudiced stomach, justifying the gangs that run these territories by denouncing the legal authorities as “racist”.

3.  Guilt-by-Association can be escaped by two avenues:

a.  The elimination of the Gang Problem. OR

b.  Leaving the community.

4.  The Politically Correct movement, especially under Obama, has impeded this righteous process on both fronts.

a.  Gangs are glorified as “heroes” for their fight against “racism”. The organisations aimed at ending gangs by all means* necessary are accused of “institutional racism”. This urban myth is circulated via the education system.

The irony here is transparent:

                       i.   Gangs displace guilt by mental manipulation. No police officer has done this, for no police department needs to use mental manipulation in order to maintain power. Their authority is that of the law, and they are all so in its debt, for what they say or do not say can be used against them in court.

In the same way, guilt is displaced on a larger scale upon law enforcement where it rightfully belongs to the gangs.

                     ii.   The educational system is its self an oppressive institution. What is called “institutional racism” was invented or otherwise perpetuated and glorified by the educational system. It was glorified as a reactionary concept, but as a diagnosis of a mental problem (“racism”) it became its self the problem it aimed to eradicate. No such problem had existed hitherto on quite the same scale.

All of us who have been-victims-of oppression by an institution at least can pardon the officers of the law because we understand their INTENT as fundamentally noble.

Yet as blood-thirsty pragmatists, educators working in conjunction with other social degenerates only focus on ENDS.

1.  In their ruthlessness, using all means necessary* to attain their righteous ends, neo-liberals focus exclusively on bringing about the END of racism. Ironically: They are pursuing racism AS AN end.

2.  The debate community in particular reflects this arrogant Utilitarianism by assessing all arguments by “Harms”, “Net Benefits”, and “Impacts”. The Effects of racism are seen to be acts of unjustified violence. Yet the whole thing is an act of projection. The police are justified in violence towards minorities in urban ghettoes in their attempts to stop gangs. These gangs are as much a threat to the innocent members of that community as they are to any one else, and those innocent members of the community include the people who are guilty of guilt-by-association. These victims-of-racism are in fact GUILTY by association because they have not done their part to eliminate the Gang Problem, and must be held responsible TO their circumstances, even if not FOR them.

3.  The educational system only represents half of the proverbial story. They do not report the violence perpetrated by gangs except under the liberal excuse of “institutional racism”. In overlooking these details they shelter students from the Truth: that the gangs are imminently responsible. For whereas Law Enforcement uses questionable means to attain Noble Ends, the gangs’ ends cannot even pass for Noble, and this is reflected in their means. There is no boundary between ends and means in working with a manipulative and coercive entity. The very ends that a gangster PURPORTS cannot be-trusted, for it is only purported under the malevolent means of extortion. So the ends must be presumed to be venge-full and greedy, unlike the ends of a law enforcement officer who selflessly puts his life on the line to uphold social order.

4.  * Thus we must conclude that, whilst both educators and police use questionable means, the means of the law enforcement are ultimately pardonable. For while this is used as part of an effective paradigm to protect civilians, its only casualties guilty by association, educators do nothing to stop this problem, but are in effect an extension OF it. What casualties the police may outwardly have are nothing to the sin committed by the educational institution: that of oppressing the MIND. As Foucault pointed out, outward violence is never quite as evil. And the ends themselves are probably shadier than what they are purported to-be, rooted in karmic problems and in fact the same venge-fullness and greed that lead instructors to self-identify (and claim allegiance with) gangsters.

b.  Rather than being-encouraged to find shelter in more-civilised communities, people in a community are in fact regarded as guilty-by-association by the P.C. movement! For by being-identified-with the gangs by an illusory distinction of “race” (one which is only practical to law enforcement), they are discouraged from leaving for fear of finding “racism” in any other community. Thus the gang maintains its hold upon the sheep, and the sheep are used as the gang’s buffer. Manipulation and extortion become, on a large scale, “social justice”. The same people that could have left a civil war-zone are used by the gangs as an excuse, for now the gangs are not doing extortion by “championing the rights of a minority” against an established “villain”: the very Police that are trying to protect the miss-guided herd!

Dm.A.A.