MEDITATIONS.
Hetero-elitism, a
sort of sexual primitivism, has today delivered me from my karma body. Gone are
many of my masturbatory temptations. This weblog is the only remaining vice. I
can only have faith in that it functions as guide.
After hours of
meditation in the shower I emerged clean, for the first time in over a year. Innocent.
Pure.
The liberal
environment of college had made me too soft. It promised, by implication, a
world of sexual gratification for every one, regardless of virtue and vice.
This was meant to breed tolerance for contemptuous perversions.
Foucault’s notions
of sexual liberation were interesting but ultimately unsatisfyingly aesthetic
and emotive.
To refer to my
Beloved as object is inferior. I would rather address her for the rest of
eternity as Thou.
Yet vindication is a
passion hard to resist.
Yes: I had observed
all of the niceties. The courtship had waited for a month prior to our second
meeting. By then I was ready to marry her.
Imagine my shock. It
was during that same rendezvous that she had developed a liking for my DE JURE
best friend. I did not protest. I must have miss-taken my insomnia that night,
an unprecedented instance, for the pains of true love. It had never been
unrequited.
I trusted my best
friend to remain loyal. He would not act, would not dare to act, knowing that I
had waited so long. Even if he had not known the month, following the five
years of isolation from erotic contact, he might have inferred it. It was
certainly a conceivable possibility, being-a-fact. After all: who would dare to
advance if not even a month had elapsed? Especially if this first meeting was
under auspices arranged by one’s own closest confidant and most cherished
friend? Surely he would not have dared to breach our trust. The simplest
POSSIBILITY that I loved her would preclude any rash and unapproved action.
Imagine
my disappointment.
The year has been
laborious. One could pen and entire novel trying to unravel her motives. But
they may remain mysterious to me forever. Even my love for her, reciprocated as
it may be, may never unravel it.
Not even the sexual
act might reveal her heart to me with that sort of exacting totality. But then:
may be the empiricists are onto some thing. Perhaps it is too soon for me to
extrapolate. For one who preaches the superiority of the coital position to all
others, it is stunning to admit that I have only my memories of past lives and
my readings to go off of.
It must be
wonder-full.
As I have said (if
I may speak passionately): My ostensible friend might have easily intuited that
a month had past; how else might I have dared intrude upon her schedule?? And
even then: how could he have dared, when a month had not yet passed???
I only recall one other instance when I had
felt so pure in recent years. That was in that month of courtship, when I
abstained from masturbation with considerable pain.
I understand that Nietzsche would
Be-disappointed with me. But am I not his peer now in the ivory tower?...
She had used my
word. “Entitled”. I ought to have-been less callous. The term, as Chris had
corrected me unwittingly[?], was “self-entitled”. And I was never
self-entitled. I have succeeded in warranting my expectations. Only an
uneducated knave would dismiss my scholarly warrants.
After
all: why bother to expend energy in seduction? The act is narcissistic and
impure. One had better allow the maiden to come to one’s self, as she had
initially met him. On a night of adventure.
How solitary. How
sad. How isolating. Have I missed some thing?
Dm.A.A.
No comments:
Post a Comment