HOMOSEX: CONCLUD.

Conclusions Regarding Homosexuality, Homophobia, and the Elitism of Heteronormativity:

There is of course nothing intrinsically symptomatic of a “phobia” in the practice of criticizing the sexual habits of others; verily, I can say that the thought of being homophobic never even crossed my mind until AFTER I had found reason to criticize homosexual practices. Perhaps, had I been more fearful a priori, some tragedy in my own life might have been prevented, though given that my critical view was the product not of irrational prejudice but rather rational reflection upon trauma it was not homosexuality per se to which I responded, but rather the entire cult of liberal individualism, as well as the transparent proto-Fascism that this romantic movement produced. The entire notion that a person’s sexuality ought to be “that person’s own business” is of course DEEPLY authoritarian, simply because it is not in practice an INDIVIDUAL right. The practice of sexuality must, outside of autoeroticism, by necessity include at least two people, and even two people conspiring for mutual satisfaction, often at the expense of a third party, might propagate a situation which is majoritarian and absurd. The matter of personal preference is negligible, only because we have at present no means by which to identify it, so no witch hunt could possibly be led against potentialities that have not yet been put into actual social practice. Appeals to the inherent entitlement that individuals should have towards their own sexual advances is inane when one considers the probable futility of any such gesture; even more inane is the suggestion that people “ought to be free” to pursue alternative lifestyles simply BECAUSE of the existence of a mainstream lifestyle, since that mainstream lifestyle (in this case, heterosexuality) is so demonstrably disappointing and absurd that exposing social deviants to the same “freedoms” would be to predispose them to the same disappointments, competitions, and alienation. Most importantly, one must recount that the entire notion that social criticism could simply be reduced to phobias or weaknesses is in fact a very recent line of thinking, one which is so totalizing and Fascistic that one would hope that the twenty-first century would bring an end to it, especially in the wake of an entire century of human rights abuses which were propagated under the assumption that morality was an expression of impotence. Scapegoating was of course a symptom of this time as well, however if we are to agree with Mr. Foucault that homosexuality is not predisposition but an action, this line of criticism can hardly be equated with genocide, since it is simply an attempt to uphold a social order that, while it never had the grandeur that Fascists everywhere ascribe to their own lineages, still offers a social order in which to operate and to actually have some chance of ATTRACTING mates, a task which is practically impossible in a society without a constantly evolving social order which is perpetually revised by questions of moral teleology and responsibility. Homosexuality may not be the problem, but its modus operandi verily is.

[({Dm.A.A.)}]