MORE CONCLUS!ONS:

I could not believe some of the things that I was hearing. It was not just that I could not agree. I did not consent to having heard these things.

Human beings must by necessity avail themselves of the greatest possible intelligence available if they are to resolve problems blamelessly. Positivism, the religious deification of science, cannot answer moral questions, so it must not be allowed to act as a substitute for moral discourse, for its attempts to do so are expressions of its deficiency. Objective grounds for action must be re-established; those who profess this re-establishment must be doubly rewarded for doing so, since they will prove to have been virtuous even when virtue was unpopular (shudder at will).

I thought that I was first in resolving these problems. How could people know what I knew and still continue as they had been doing? But now I know they were not people, after all.

The Greatest Possible Intelligence is God. Human beings cannot resolve crises by their wills alone; they have no imperative to do so, so from whence emanates the motivation to survive??

It is impossible for people to have opposing feelings about whose needs are most important. All feeling is a reaffirmation of all bodily and mental needs. There can be no boundary permissible between them; it is oppressive to segregate them. The problems of relativism and emotivism is not even in its reduction of morality to emotion but rather its implication that emotions are not held in common between people, as though we were simply genies who could create “our own feelings” out of thin air. So long as people allow for relativism and emotivism to predominate, forgetting the objective universality of our shared emotional burden, our feelings will be subject to division by the ideology.

[({Dm.A.A.)}]

Pressing and Depressing Questions:

1.         Why is it legal and permissible to ignore homeless people?

a.         Ignoring your boss may be met with termination.

b.         Ignoring your spouse may be met with divorce.

c.         Ignoring your children may be met with rebellion.

d.         Ignoring your parents may be met with abuse.

e.         Ignoring your government may be met with arrest.

f.         Ignoring officers of the law may be met with violence.

g.         Homeless people need an audience more so than all of the above do.

h.         They are indiscriminate in whom they need it from.

i.         This means: if they are still in need of attention, it is because no one has given them that attention yet.

j.         It follows logically: by ignoring them, you perpetuate a terrible example.

2.         How am I not entitled to having my ideas heard?

a.         Ideas are more important than people or physical objects.

b.         The ability to produce ideas is the solitary function of the human being.

c.         All problems can only be resolved with ideas.

d.         In the absence of a hierarchy of status, which is an absurdly BAD idea that must never be implemented, all social change can only be made through the free proliferation of ideas, each one of which must by necessity inspire an estimated hundred (minimum!!) ideas in everyone who hears it, each one of them unique, so no idea is ever repeated.

e.         In the absence of authorities, each idea must be implemented, unless it is proven bad by force of reason.

f.         All ideas lead to synthesis, since all ideas come from the Original Idea and carry its teleological impetus.

g.         All evil is the result of repeating ideas, creating bad ideas in the absence of new ideas.

h.         No one’s ideas are inherently more important than anyone else’s, since all minds are capable of receiving transmissions from the Ideal Realm where new ideas come from.

i.         It is permissible to hold an idea in such high regard that one wishes all people to actualize it.

j.         It is impermissible to favour one’s own idea SIMPLY BECAUSE it is one’s own, and if one wishes to pretend towards humility by claiming that one wants only to work on one’s own idea, WITHOUT COMPELLING ANYONE ELSE TO, one reveals a narcissistic and dangerous infatuation with not only the idea but the work itself, which must withstand scrutiny.

k.         Compelling someone to work on an idea is no different than allowing that person to do so.

l.         Working on one’s own ideas without accepting help is a form of hypocrisy, for if it is important enough for even one person to work on then it must be binding.

m.         All questions of permissibility must be resolved prior to the consideration of any questions of fact, since ideals must be consolidated before they are implemented.

n.         Anyone who contradicts this valuation has all ready fallen into error and treachery.

o.         There can be no reality, in fact, without ethic.

[({Dm.A.A.)}]