It’s high time I came
clean with you. I should have realized that you would never have inferred that
there had been a sentimental weakness underlying my attempts to keep this
conversation going. You were unpresumptuous and analytical enough to dismiss our
correspondence as an irreconcilable intellectual feud, and it was only natural
for you to defend your own position against what you had presumed to be an
ignorant viewpoint. Might I instead suggest that it was a more open but less
disciplined one? I do not truly believe that, but it is nice to think that.
The truth is that I was
among your many aesthetic admirers. Naturally, I avoided making this known so
as not to fall into the trap of logocentrism, thereby yielding to your
reductionistic, positivistic viewpoint. On a more fundamental level, I avoid making
overt, conventional expressions of erotic affection so as not to be made an
object of knowledge, hence probably causing confusion for an aspiring
naturalist.
What it was that kept me
coming back I cannot say for certain. Perhaps I couldn’t bring myself to think
that you had been the selfish, narcissistic sort of person whom I first
imagined myself to encounter. Eastern European women seldom appeal to me,
(though the obverse tends to be true, inexplicably,) probably because I am
myself of Eastern European birth. I must have suspected that I was addicted to
the abuse with which I perceived you to treat me, though over time I forgave
you for that. Peculiarly enough, even my attempts to disguise my identity
quickly came unfurled. My only comfort was in knowing that you had bothered to
remember me. That tipped me off that there was more to you than met the eye. Perhaps
your inquisitive nature was motivated by a transcendental aim.
This aim I sought to
unriddle. Multiple times I contacted you, in many guises, trying to present you
as I saw you, in an attempt to make peace with you and with how you see
yourself. Yet repeatedly you distanced yourself from me. I knew not why. Yet it
is clear to me now: you still regard me as a rival of some sort. Instead of
confessing to the emotional impact that your words had upon me, I continued to
fight with you. It was not that I did not understand you. I just had not made
this understanding understood.
Recently I saw you
commend one of your followers for confessing to what he called a “crush”. I was
taken aback not by his childish honesty but your equally childlike appreciation
of it. It became apparent to me that you see the world in very simple, even naïve
terms, and had I fit more neatly into your taxonomy of personality then I would
have won your favour. This I cannot do. I’m not whatever you might think I am,
at least not exclusively, nor will I be. Yet in exposing a more vulnerable side
to myself I hope to reconcile.
P.S.: It’s funny, too. I
look at pictures of you and I find myself thinking, “She is so gorgeous. How does
she get around?” That might appear ironic to you; the conventional response is
rather “how does she NOT get around?” But I acknowledge that in calling you “gorgeous”
I only make a radically subjective claim which does not live up to your
Science. I feel a desire which I know that even I cannot fulfill, and if even
so strong a longing cannot be fulfilled, then how can yours, when you seem so
serene and free of physical attachments?
It is good that I’ve had
time to find my path over the last two years. My envy has abated, and my
confidence directs me now. I hope that you will receive these words in the
Spirit in which they were intended. Keep doing what you do, and keep smiling. I
know not to accuse you of any further ignorance or evil. You are not a fearful
person, unlike many.
No comments:
Post a Comment