Children:
All life carries intrinsic meaning.
The fetus is all ready a human being.
It does not have gender when it is still vulnerable to
abortion.
Thus abortion is not a women’s issue but a human issue.
It is literally the only human issue that is neither a women’s
issue nor a men’s issue.
Because life matters, abortion is immoral.
This is not a matter of individual discernment.
It is Universal to Human Beings and ubiquitous to Rational
Beings.
Part of female identity must be the exceptional care that she takes
of her body, only because it might bear a child.
No feminist interested in distributing pity amidst rape
victims wants to help the woman to prevent rape in the first place.
It is too embarrassing to admit to a part in the victimhood.
So the irrational prejudice acts as a demeaning evil whose aid must come late
and all ways depends upon the existence of victims. Such a necessity on the
part of the organization produces the fatalism that characterizes misandry.
Hence men are falsely convicted of being rapists. The alienation that they
experience as a result produces the rapist.
The affirmation of life as having intrinsic meaning ends this
cycle of abuse.
Abuse towards the unborn child is literally the karma whose
other end rests in abuse of the woman.
Older institutions prevented both with greater success than we
can find in the present.
Feminism is predicated upon the presupposition that women are
capable of Reason.
Egalitarianism indicates that every one must have an equal
opportunity at the Truth.
Thus egalitarian feminism must conclude that logical
conclusions are Universal and available to all Rational Beings who simply
choose to avail of them.
There are no women’s issues or men’s issues. The very notion
is sexist.
There are only human issues.
Abortion is the topic that transcends the distinction.
Abortion is Universally immoral.
Parenthood is all ways a choice.
Childhood is all ways a fate.
Children cannot be called selfish by default.
They pursue their needs at all costs.
But selfishness is not the pursuit of needs.
It is the pursuit of wants at the EXPENSE of others’ needs.
To learn discernment is to learn to distinguish needs from
wants.
Selfishness is all so characterized by AGGRESSION.
Only some children show early signs of aggression.
These signs are independent in many cases of upbringing.
Many children need not be aggressive to have their needs met.
They are those whose parents did their job.
If they are aggressive any way, it is because they are
pursuing wants rather than needs.
This behavior must be prohibited.
Any one who fails to absolves himself of any right to judge of
children.
If sex is suspected often as a motive, this prejudice can only
be justified if sex is acknowledged as a need.
If sex is a need, it follows that it is a right towards which
one is entitled.
Only by protecting needs can one discern selfishness from
altruism, for failure to do so would be the pursuit of a desire at an other’s
expense. This would threaten the entire moral fabric that preserves Humanity.
An injustice does not cease to be an injustice because it is
vocalized.
Facts do not cease to be facts because they are ignored.
Contemporary thought daemonizes the rapist for pursuing his
needs.
This is ostensibly childish behavior.
Yet that accusation is daemonizing of the very INNOCENT people
that children are.
In fact: to be a “victim” of rape one must still be a child,
because an adult woman should, as previously explained, take precautions.
Feminism suggests that “don’t rape” and “don’t get raped” are
distinct.
Yet this is a false duality from the perspective of the unborn
fetus.
If life does not have intrinsic value, every thing is
permissible.
If rationality is not Universal, any thing can be
rationalized.
One has no alternative but to admit to the Universality of
Logic.
It is not Universality that threatens the human being, but
Relativism.
The rapist would in THEORY regard his logic as Universal.
Yet if we permit Relativism to take the place of Universalism
then he needs not even a defense. All logic is relative to HIM.
The rapist has rights.
His rights are to have his needs met and to find Equality with
all of non-celibate Humanity.
Preferential treatment has robbed him.
Hypocrisy has made him a scapegoat.
But his attitude follows logically from moral decay within the
social system that condemns him.
If he cannot retain his rights, neither can his victim.
In that sense, victim and assailant are one.
The assailant actualizes this oneness via the violent act.
Yet the violence is unnecessary if the Need is acknowledged as
Right to begin with.
So rape cannot be an exceptional justification for abortion.
Abortion would have therefore to justify rape.
Yet it is preferable to acknowledge the Universal Value of
Life.
Only then can one put an end to the violence.
This is what it means to value human rights.
The conventional view is that women are incapable of Reason
and misconstrue aggression as self-entitlement. The view continues to suggest
that aggression is necessary to receive sexual satisfaction on the parts of
both parties.
This is what “rape culture” signifies.
To be dispossessed of this view, we must conclude that
aggression is unnecessary.
We must substantiate it by behaving like trees rather than
parasites: receiving, giving, but never taking.
We must all so therefore be careful that we do not hold people
to double-standards for hormonal reasons. Encouraging activity in deed that one
discourages in word is a form of hypocrisy. If “self-entitlement” is rewarded, it
becomes justified. And the rapist finds a rational excuse. The act of violence
is deduced from the premise. The deduction is valid. It is only the premise
that is false.
Such matters must be handled at their core.
The solution to inequality in sexual practice is Trust.
No ideology can produce Trust.
It is a choice on the part of the Individual.
Trust dissolves boundaries and prejudices in a way that does
not require force.
Trust is the affirmation of the Intrinsic Value of Life.
It protects all.
Thus we must remember that the World owes us something. And we
owe something to the World. If Life is to be preserved as an Intrinsic (rather
than arbitrary) Value, it must be acknowledged as an Intrinsic Imperative.
Otherwise we remain children in the lesser sense.
To be a Child in the Greater Sense is to be well-integrated
and blameless.
One-sidedness is a mark of barbarism.
The mark of a civilization’s character is in how it treats its
children.
Taking only what we need, we become patient.
Feeding the needs of the neighbor, except when REASON forbids
us to, we become safe.
All scapegoating is the result of a lack of Integration.
The alpha male projects weakness upon the beta male.
The hyperfeminine woman projects evil upon hypermasculine men.
One is not born a rapist.
One becomes one by being perceived as one.
Such is sociology.
Become again as children if you wish to see the Kingdom.
Dm.A.A.
This was written from the proud perspective of a detached and
celibate observer.
No comments:
Post a Comment