The Lost Community and the Paradise of the Past.
Progress is definitely a RECENT invention.
It was really the product of the work of Hegel, a rather
stuffy German intellectual of the eighteenth century.
As it turns out, Foucault was right in saying that every
student of philosophy would find Hegel standing at the end of every corridor of
contemporary Western thought. Yet Foucault made one classically French mistake:
he excluded the Uninitiated Public. It is not only the philosopher who
encounters Hegel. EVERY one encounters Hegel! Yet few know it.
This is not unlike the paradox of Samadhi. All beings are
enlightened, but only the Initiated Few are aware of this fact. Elitism and
egalitarianism are a duality that the ascetic yogi leaves behind.
Hegel was of course the teacher of Marx. And Marxism suffuses
contemporary neo-Liberal thought, which permeates our media and social common
sense.
Marx insisted that, as in the Hegelian model, history is a
MARCH OF PROGRESS. Yet Hegel, the hyper-rational Virgo, (whose notorious Taurus
pupil was of a common Earthly Element) had made the mistake of excluding any
Religion that could not be rationalized. And so it would be with the man who
famously uttered the words that “religion is the opiate of the masses.”
Consider what is considered the oldest Human Religion: (at
least by its own estimation, which has not been out of accord with the findings
of contemporary Aristotlean physics) Hinduism. According to Hinduism, Time is Cyclical.
It comes not in waves but rather cycles. (I do not preclude that it can come
all so in waves, but let us make the idiomatic accommodation for one moment.)
The Yuga Cycle begins in a Golden Age that is longer than any
of the following Ages, and this is a period of Peace devoid of even the
conception or the hint of Evil or Discord. Then the Cycle proceeds into the
Silver Age, wherein Evil is first introduced in dim shades and creeping,
unsettling whispers, not yet shocking but novel and disquieting. Evil bubbles
up to the surface over those millennia, until it reaches Balance with Good in
the Bronze Age. It is interesting to note that people are in our age often
puzzled by Star Wars; “How can one restore Balance to the Force by destroying
half of it?” The half is of course Evil, or the Dark Side. The Balance that our
contemporary mind conceives of is the Warlike balance of the Bronze Age, and it
speaks volumes of our depravity that we can think of balance only in terms of
Equal Grounds for violence between two warring factions. The Balance that the
Jedi speak of is of course the HARMONY of the Golden Age, devoid of the
disturbing CHAOS that is Evil and Ignorance.
The Final Stage of the Yuga Cycle is the Iron Age. This is
all so referred to as the Kali Yuga, the Age of Black Time. In this stage, Shiva
takes the form of Kali, a daemon that enshrouds the Manifest World in Darkness
and Despair. During this age, time speeds up, the Teachers of the Ancient
Wisdom Disciplines are totally marginalized and ignored, and Evil triumphs over
Good. The consequence is a cataclysmic event that has been Universally promised
throughout the World’s Religions: The End of the World. At that point the Cycle
begins anew, and Balance is restored.
We are living in the Kali Yuga presently.
We have been for a while.
It is said to end around 2025 or so.
Considering this perspective it is easy to see that progress
is sort of a silly idea. Yes: science, reinforced by the Hegelian superstitions
of the eighteenth century, (as well as those of the SEVENTEENTH century which
Hegel himself drew upon) creates the illusion of progress. But think of the
arts, for instance. Alan Watts said that we have to walk with two feet forward,
that every step of one foot deserves a step by its opposite; that in short technological
progress must be accompanied by an increase in SKILL in the use of that
technology.
Yet the music industry shows otherwise. Musicianship is no
longer respected as either a tradition NOR some thing that one can “just pick
up” as though from a past life. The CORPORATION runs EVERY aspect of it. It
tunes all the music to the same frequency, (A = 440 Hertz, a.k.a. Goebbels’
Frequency) exhibits an egregious and even barbaric degree of Compression (Bill
O’Reilley once Fascistically denied that the Red Hot Chili Peppers were being
used to torture prisoners from the Middle East, whose sensibilities for music
would of course be of a surpassing subtlety, and his denial is despite the fact
that audiophiles have called that very band “unlistenable” owing mainly to
their Absurd compression tendencies), and confines our ears to four-chord songs
by people who cannot sing artfully but are still praised for having won the
vocal “competition” necessary to get a record deal. We all know that this
Emperor is not wearing any clothes, but we subject ourselves to the monotony of
redundant radio airplay because we are discouraged from complaining if we cannot
Do, we are discouraged from Doing is we cannot Succeed, and we are told that we
cannot Succeed unless we Conform, meaning, upon the reflection we perform
in isolation, that we would simply Become-the-Problem by trying to solve it. And
since we are all ostensibly “equal”, the isolated critic does not even think to
raise his voice in Absurd Protest, for to do so would be to state a redundant
fact, and if HE cannot do it, why should he believe that any body else (any one
“better than him”, which he refuses to imagine) CAN?
It is not hard to imagine that we are living in the End Times
when one considers just this one example. Our strides in technology, which
Hinduism Itself had prophesized as the Mastery of the Electricities, have
afforded us a studio abounding in recording hardware and software which remains
in the hands of an Elite who control most of our Media and Common Sense. And
what do they do with it? Devoid of tradition, save for that of the twentieth
century, (when the Nazis were in power and had gained psychic influence,
ostensibly, over the London Orchestra) the Industry ABUSES its technology and
allows its puppets to be street-rats and vengeful degenerates who want only a
skyrocket to success in place of the laborious process that it takes to MASTER
something, REGARDLESS of whether or not one is ultimately Known for it. The Way
of the Lone Ascetic Yogi has all but vanished; nothing is enjoyed for its own
sake any more, for it is all ways made to serve a Utilitarian Process that
would ultimately re-enforce the Consumer Capitalist Culture. Yet all the while
liberals preach progress and pretend that civility is a product of the last
seventeen years, and the very people who should be fighting the Corporate State
are its staunchest advocates, every bit as much as they had been in 1970.
NOW do you believe me that the World is Coming to an End?
In context, it is laughable (though one shudders to laugh
openly in public about it) when some millennial insists that the Past was Great
if You Were White. The Hindus were not white, though the personification of
their Saints was. The Zen Buddhists were not White, though they prized that
colour above diamonds and rubies. Enlightenment and Purification is a Universal
Human Theme. And it is ultimately the totalization of Individual Potential. So
it would follow logically that the measure of a Culture’s Health is in relation
to this Higher Good and Spiritual Greatness. So a hierarchy of cultures is
totally appropriate and necessary; to live without it would be to delve into
madness.
Discrimination used to be a term of masculinity, alongside
its synonyms discernment and discretion. Decadence was a mark of shame; to have
“class” meant to have attained great progress, or to have been born into a
noble tradition and raised in accordance with it. To be “aristocratic” was
lauded by even the most egalitarian of intellectuals, to be seated “upon a high
horse” meant that one was courtly and sophisticated, and one met condescension
with respect, for it was an opportunity to Learn Something. To be “old” was to
be Wise, and no one spoke of Equality without sounding pretentious and
self-entitled, for while there are standards by which to assess Superiority,
and even these standards had to be tested, how can one assess Equality? Would
any one ACTUALLY subordinate one’s self to the values of a total stranger just
based upon that stranger’s WHIM? Who is HE to preach his own conception of
Equality? In whose God’s Eyes are we Equal, that I might not be allowed to
point out the error of another’s ways?
And this is not peculiar to our generation. It was a problem
as early on as in Kierkegaard’s time. Yet as the problem grows so does
ignorance of it. Once a theory is “disproven” by the Scientific Community, it
is forgotten, however effective it was in enriching and even saving the
Individual Life. Hence Jung’s work remains not only unfinished but untouched
throughout the world of psychology, so that the vast majority of psychic data
(the Unconscious) is left untapped and only a standardized set of tautological,
self-contradictory theories about the Conscious mind – that do not even admit
to their own contradiction, as Kierkegaard, Jung, and Buddha would! – is left
in its place, like a stopper on the Soul.
What was life in the past, then?
In the past: it did not matter “who you were”. The millennial
argument that Generation So-and-So was “good if you were white” etc. is silly
because the notion of being “white” is in fact ALL SO a recent invention. Even
if it was around at the conception of the United States, the traditions that
DROVE that conception and its immediate aftermath reached back MUCH further,
drawing on rich traditions as a mature Oak draws nutrients from its loamy home
via its roots.
What made the Past GREAT was that what mattered was NOT “who
you were” but WHAT SOCIETY WAS. No matter WHO you were in respect to the social
hierarchy of your culture, you were a contributor TO this culture, and its
collective greatness was yours. And this Goal, once attained, was of such
brilliance that it could ubiquitously surpass any individual ambitions one
might have. Even the LOWLIEST life form, the parasitic villain whose envy
threatens to destroy the civil social fabric, was a Part of the Whole, and that
is not distinct from the Beatific Vision that all the world’s religions since
the early days of Hinduism have expressed. Yet the poetry is lost on the
contemporary person who is so upset by the expression of his own “lowliness”
(though it is not explicitly stated in his case; his own conscience and
insecurity simply supplement the details.) that he ignores the point, which is
literally the Bigger Picture: the WHOLE!!
It should be noted that I am not expressing a Fascistic
paradigm, but rather its total antithesis, and not an antithesis in the sense
of an equal opponent of equal terror and foreboding, but rather an antithesis
in the sense of its rightful conqueror. (The former interpretation is a Kali
Yuga attitude; the latter is a Bronze Age mentality, and the miscommunication
between the two is analogous to the aforementioned distance between the Golden
and Bronze Ages.)
Fascism commits the Fallacy of Naturalism. It insists that
the Past was Great BECAUSE IT WAS THE PAST, and so only by FORCING OUR WAY we
can RECREATE THE PAST. This is archaism. It is the reason that Romanticism has
produced Fascism.
MY mentality is not Archaism. I do not purport that the Past
is great BECAUSE it was the Past; let me be perfectly clear about that. I
insist rather that the Past was Great because it was CLOSER TO ETERNITY. It is
by finding ETERNITY that one transcends the Kali Yuga.
So in that sense Progress is possible. And it is only so in
that sense. Because this is what transcendence of modernity offers that
equality cannot:
Freedom.
Freedom to say what you feel even if others think you’re
crazy.
Freedom from Kafkaesque institutions that obligate you to
subordinate yourself to what the Corporate State approves of as a sensible
state of consciousness.
Freedom to, as Levitch put it, “stand up on a chair in the
middle of the room to change perspective.”
Freedom to preach one’s Truth, as part of a Greater Truth,
without being condemned by those who arrogantly brag that they have none.
Freedom to love against the rules and to live out of one’s
conscience even when it is above the Law.
Freedom from subordinating one’s Joys to the Will of the
Group even when those Joys are of a HIGHER QUALITY than the Joys of the Group’s
adherents, whose alarm and envy at one’s deviance is just as arbitrary as their
own Joys.
Freedom to heal and to forgive those adherents without being
taken advantage of BY them owing to the same ignorance that one has to heal and
forgive in them.
Freedom to teach and to learn.
Freedom to EXCEL.
Freedom to TRANSCEND.
Freedom to LIVE AT ONE’S TOTAL CAPACITY, or at least to have
that hope.
It is not unusual for a contemporary youth to consider the justifications
underlying a ban on climbing Mount Everest. Rape cannot be justified to the millennial
mind (at least not publically), but murder can. And so can the barbaric murder
of our freedom, under the auspices of Our Protection!!
What became of the desire to fulfill that Spiritual Purpose
that comes from climbing to the Highest Peak, at great personal risk to one’s
petty human life, if only to come near to touching the Cosmos?!?
What became of the desire to grow up as the Redwood Tree
does, to live simply by giving and receiving, never TAKING like the parasite
does but neither being troubled by its pettiness, forever rooted and yet
constantly reaching closer and closer to the Infinite, without NEEDING to dally
or change direction and topple?!?
The Voices of the Past speak of these ideals.
And some of these voices are quite recent. They are only
forgotten because, as time speeds up, forgetfulness gains in pitch, just as our
music has risen by 8 Hertz from its Harmony with the Cosmos.
But it is not impossible to Progress still.
Find Inner Transcendence, and think not that this comes at
the expense of External Accountability. It is rather that, as Kierkegaard
explained and explicated, the Religious Dimension INFORMS the Moral One. And
from either vantage point one can spot a fake or traitor. But ONLY from one of
them; an aesthete who has not yet self-initiated his Spiritual Quest, but who
has only pretended to it, or who has reached the apex of his Icarean flight and
then plummeted into the Diabolical, has no opinion of value. His value is only
as a part of the whole, as all parasites are. And as has all ways been known,
it is only from a great height that he can be truly loved, for there is so
little love from his own perspective. As I have stated, enlightenment
transcends egalitarianism and elitism, including both. He too is a part of the
Whole, but only by condescension towards him can this whole be seen, for he is
blind to it.
And I say “SELF-initiated” not without sincerity.
The longing for the traditions of the past is fierce in many.
But guidance from the elders can do little for us now.
Even they are susceptible to ill persuasion now.
Each of us must find one’s own way.
Yet paradoxically solidarity matters more now than ever
before.
One must marry individualism with solidarity.
One must learn to judge by the loyalty of one’s fellows.
Contradiction is not a problem, unless it is a faithlessness.
Paradox is a test of faith, for it involves a leap of faith, riding without the
training wheels of Reason. We must not confuse paradoxical contradictions for
faithlessness. And we must learn to recognize faithlessness intuitively before
it tears us apart again.
Namaste.
Dm.A.A.
No comments:
Post a Comment